Chipili fire, 24 August 2017 Chipili
The fire started on 24 August 2017 in Chipili, Zambia, and satellites saw it burning for 21 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 20,350 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 73th largest in Luapula since 2016 (of 533 with a page). Number 15 in Zambia in 2017, of 230.
- Burnt area
- 20,350ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 21days
- 24 Aug 2017 – 13 Sept 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- districts
- Started on
- 24 Aug
- 2017
- Heat detections
- 817
- in a single hotspot: 86 MW
- Danger at start
- 42
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 9.9GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
50% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 10,423 ha in 2016.
- 4,638 ha Chipili fire, August 2016 31,556 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,061 ha Chipili fire, August 2016 4,742 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 100 ha Kawambwa fire, August 2016 123,335 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
What happened to each town
-
Chipili where it started20,472 ha reached on 24 Aug4.8 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug | 30.9 °C | 15 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 25 Aug | 30.6 °C | 15 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 26 Aug | 29.4 °C | 18 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 27 Aug | 29.3 °C | 23 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 28 Aug | 28.2 °C | 19 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 29 Aug | 26.6 °C | 24 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 30 Aug | 29.3 °C | 20 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 31 Aug | 30.3 °C | 15 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 1 Sept | 30.0 °C | 13 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 2 Sept | 29.1 °C | 14 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 3 Sept | 28.7 °C | 21 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 4 Sept | 28.1 °C | 25 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 5 Sept | 28.9 °C | 26 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 6 Sept | 29.9 °C | 26 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 7 Sept | 30.1 °C | 19 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 8 Sept | 29.7 °C | 20 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 9 Sept | 30.0 °C | 21 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 10 Sept | 29.8 °C | 24 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 11 Sept | 30.4 °C | 18 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 12 Sept | 30.5 °C | 18 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 13 Sept | 30.4 °C | 18 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 14 Sept after | 30.7 °C | 17 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 15 Sept after | 31.4 °C | 16 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 16 Sept after | 31.4 °C | 15 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 17 Sept after | 32.6 °C | 17 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 18 Sept after | 32.8 °C | 14 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 19 Sept after | 32.1 °C | 17 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 20 Sept after | 31.2 °C | 24 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 21 Sept after | 31.6 °C | 18 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 22 Sept after | 31.1 °C | 17 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 23 Sept after | 31.3 °C | 19 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 817Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 156,557 haLupososhi1 August 2026 · 52 days · 1 km away
- 36,195 haChipili26 July 2024 · 21 days · 3 km away
- 110,204 haChipili9 August 2025 · 32 days · 4 km away
- 35,869 haLupososhiAugust 2019 · 17 days · 21 km away
- 81,932 haChipili9 August 2019 · 33 days · 23 km away
- 296,161 haMansa15 August 2025 · 37 days · 32 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Chipili fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 24 August 2017 and 13 September 2017: 21 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 20,350 hectares (203.5 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Chipili (20,472 ha, 4.8 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 30.9 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 51 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 52, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zambia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.