Skip to content
worldfires
BO · Bolivia · –

Charagua fire, 5 September 2019 Roboré, Charagua

Out · last detection 24 Sept 2019, 17:51 UTC

The fire started on 5 September 2019 in Charagua, Bolivia, and satellites saw it burning for 20 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 49,382 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 43th largest in Santa Cruz since 2016 (of 784 with a page). Number 19 in Bolivia in 2019, of 218.

Burnt area
49,382ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
20days
5 Sept 2019 – 24 Sept 2019
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
5 Sept
2019
Heat detections
1,825
in a single hotspot: 0 MW
Danger at start
28
High · FWI index
Average daily power
3.3GW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 5 Sept24 Sept
24 Sept 2019

How it evolved, day by day

5 Sept 2019 · 36 MW · 3 6 Sept 2019 · 3,971 MW · 67 7 Sept 2019 · 9,595 MW · 103 8 Sept 2019 · 16,628 MW · 199 9 Sept 2019 · 4,651 MW · 282 10 Sept 2019 · 676 MW · 93 11 Sept 2019 · 1,072 MW · 48 12 Sept 2019 · 153 MW · 58 13 Sept 2019 · 895 MW · 84 14 Sept 2019 · 4,927 MW · 174 15 Sept 2019 · 8,305 MW · 173 16 Sept 2019 · 935 MW · 100 17 Sept 2019 · 2,376 MW · 152 18 Sept 2019 · 2,670 MW · 54 19 Sept 2019 · 1,084 MW · 63 20 Sept 2019 · 203 MW · 16 21 Sept 2019 · 712 MW · 19 22 Sept 2019 · 2,230 MW · 42 23 Sept 2019 · 3,210 MW · 78 24 Sept 2019 · 788 MW · 17
5 Sept 8 Sept 13 Sept 17 Sept 21 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

39°high
76km/h · peak gust
21%lowest humidity

It had gone 4 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.8 mm on 25 Sept.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 31% of the area of London (494 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Roboré 18,763 inhabitants
    35,113 ha
    4.8 %
  2. Charagua 101,733 inhabitants where it started
    14,511 ha
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area0.56 ha
Residents≈ 30

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.56 hectares of built-up land and about 30 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
5 Sept 30.9 °C 37 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
6 Sept 36.1 °C 31 % 45 km/h 0.2 mm High 36
7 Sept 37.8 °C 27 % 61 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
8 Sept 38.1 °C 30 % 62 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
9 Sept 38.1 °C 24 % 71 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 59
10 Sept 37.1 °C 29 % 58 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
11 Sept 36.9 °C 34 % 53 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
12 Sept 27.9 °C 45 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
13 Sept 30.0 °C 47 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
14 Sept 37.1 °C 29 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
15 Sept 38.8 °C 21 % 57 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 57
16 Sept 39.4 °C 27 % 55 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
17 Sept 31.6 °C 42 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
18 Sept 30.1 °C 47 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
19 Sept 37.9 °C 35 % 76 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
20 Sept 30.8 °C 51 % 55 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
21 Sept 30.5 °C 39 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
22 Sept 32.1 °C 36 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
23 Sept 35.3 °C 35 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
24 Sept 37.7 °C 35 % 24 km/h 0.5 mm High 31
25 Sept after 27.6 °C 50 % 51 km/h 1.8 mm Moderate 16

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 28.5, a minimum humidity of 37% and 4 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 34.

FWI at the start 28.5
Minimum humidity 37 %
Days without rain 4
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

San Matías fire, December 2020
3,955 ha 11 days FWI 26.2 Min. humidity 37 % 230 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 3.1 mm on 30 Dec.

What happened to them

10 days
median duration
3,403 ha
median area
3 %
went past 10,000 ha
5.3 mm
rain at the end (median; 29 of 34 had it)

It was 14.5 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 20 days, against 10 days.

None of its 34 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 5 of 34, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.3 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

1.8 mmfirst rain
25 Septthe day after it ended
76km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 24 Sept, and on 25 Sept 1.8 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 29 of 34, with a median of 5.3 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 29 Aug 2019
After · 1 Oct 2019

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 0Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Bolivia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Charagua fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 5 September 2019 and 24 September 2019: 20 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 49,382 hectares (493.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Roboré (35,113 ha, 4.8 %); Charagua (14,511 ha, 0.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 39.4 °C, humidity dropped to 21 % and gusts hit 76 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 59, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Bolivia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 34. Their median duration was 10 days and their median area 3,403 ha; 3 % went past 10,000 ha. None of its 34 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 5 of 34, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.3 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 119 · 110 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Start date: 29 August 2019 → 5 September 2019.
  2. Start date: 5 September 2019 → 29 August 2019.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 119 · 110.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.