Skip to content
worldfires
RO · Romania · –

Ceru-Băcăinți fire, March 2025 Ceru-Băcăinți, Zlatna

Out · last detection 10 Mar 2025, 01:50 UTC

The fire started on 4 March 2025 in Ceru-Băcăinți, Romania, and satellites saw it burning for 7 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 575 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 2th largest in Alba since 2016 (of 27 with a page). Number 15 in Romania in 2025, of 137.

The power measured by the satellite is low (11.7 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
575ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
7days
4 Mar 2025 – 10 Mar 2025
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
4 Mar
2025
Heat detections
9
in a single hotspot: 12 MW
Danger at start
0
Very low · FWI index
Average daily power
13MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 4 Mar10 Mar
10 Mar 2025

How it evolved, day by day

6 Mar 2025 · 2 MW · 2 7 Mar 2025 · 34 MW · 4 10 Mar 2025 · 4 MW · 3
6 Mar 7 Mar 10 Mar

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

19°high
25km/h · peak gust
9%lowest humidity

It had gone one day without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 5.3 mm on 11 Mar.

This area had burned before

50% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 252 ha in 2022, 170 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 290 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.4% of the area of London (5.8 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Ceru-Băcăinți 227 inhabitants · fire reached the centre where it started
    575 ha reached on 6 Mar
    12 %
  2. Zlatna 6,652 inhabitants · 12.9 km from the centre
    0 ha
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Other natural land69 %
  • Broadleaved forest25 %
  • Agricultural areas6.1 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
4 Mar 11.9 °C 31 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 0
5 Mar 14.6 °C 20 % 17 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 1
6 Mar 17.0 °C 16 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 4
7 Mar 19.4 °C 10 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm Low 6
8 Mar 18.7 °C 14 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm Low 6
9 Mar 18.9 °C 9 % 14 km/h 0.0 mm Low 7
10 Mar 19.1 °C 10 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Low 9
11 Mar after 14.2 °C 38 % 51 km/h 5.3 mm Low 6

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 0.3, a minimum humidity of 31% and 1 day without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 26.

FWI at the start 0.3
Minimum humidity 31 %
Days without rain 1
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Vorța fire, February 2025
947 ha 3 days FWI 0.6 Min. humidity 30 % 45 km away, in 2025

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 3.1 mm on 28 Feb.

What happened to them

2 days
median duration
174 ha
median area
4 %
went past 1,000 ha
5.4 mm
rain at the end (median; 23 of 26 had it)

It was 3.3 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 7 days, against 2 days.

Only 5 of its 26 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 3 of 26, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.4 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

5.3 mmfirst rain
11 Marthe day after it ended
25km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 10 Mar, and on 11 Mar 5.3 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 23 of 26, with a median of 5.4 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 25 Feb 2025
After · 17 Mar 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 5 March 2025 the air beside the fire reached 18 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 15: 1.0 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak18 µg/m³
Days over the guideline1 day
PM1019 µg/m³
Optical depth0.26
2 Mar4 Mar6 Mar8 Mar
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 9Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Romania

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Ceru-Băcăinți fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 4 March 2025 to 10 March 2025 (7 days). The perimeter dates it from 4 March 2025 to 6 March 2025.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 575 hectares (5.8 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Ceru-Băcăinți (575 ha, 12 %); Zlatna (0 ha, 0.0 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Ceru-Băcăinți and reached its centre: the point marking it was inside the burnt area or less than 500 metres from it. That does not mean houses burned.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 19.4 °C, humidity dropped to 9 % and gusts hit 25 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 9, class Low.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Romania (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 26. Their median duration was 2 days and their median area 174 ha; 4 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 5 of its 26 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 3 of 26, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.4 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 4 March 2025 to 6 March 2025. 9 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.