Skip to content
worldfires
ES · Spain ·

Casas de Don Pedro fire, July 2017 Casas de Don Pedro

Out · last detection 13 Jul 2017, 13:59 UTC

The fire started on 13 July 2017 in Casas de Don Pedro, Spain, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 162 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality. According to EGIF (MITECO), it was detected on 13 July 2017 at 13:00 and declared extinguished on 20 July 2017.

It is the 39th largest in Badajoz since 2016 (of 52 with a page). Number 107 in Spain in 2017, of 144.

Burnt area
162ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
1day
13 Jul 2017 – 13 Jul 2017
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
13 Jul
2017
Heat detections
6
in a single hotspot: 245 MW
Danger at start
33
High · FWI index
Average daily power
1.2GW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 13 Jul13 Jul

How it evolved, day by day

13 Jul 2017 · 1,172 MW · 6

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

42°high
32km/h · peak gust
15%lowest humidity

It had gone 4 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Casas de Don Pedro 1,375 inhabitants · 5.5 km from the centre where it started
    162 ha reached on 13 Jul
    1.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Other natural land79 %
  • Agricultural areas16 %
  • Scrub and transitional woodland5.1 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

Official record

According to EGIF (MITECO), this fire started on 13 July 2017 and burned 159 ha (the satellite measured 162 ha).

MITECO, Estadística General de Incendios Forestales (EGIF). This is the agency’s consolidated statistic: it measures the area in its own way, which is why it can differ from the satellite.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
13 Jul 41.6 °C 15 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
14 Jul after 40.7 °C 13 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
15 Jul after 39.0 °C 11 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
16 Jul after 39.3 °C 9 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
17 Jul after 36.8 °C 15 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
18 Jul after 37.3 °C 20 % 43 km/h 0.2 mm Very high 39
19 Jul after 31.3 °C 27 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
20 Jul after 30.8 °C 23 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
21 Jul after 30.4 °C 25 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
22 Jul after 32.4 °C 20 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
23 Jul after 34.7 °C 17 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 32.7, a minimum humidity of 15% and 4 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 27.

FWI at the start 32.7
Minimum humidity 15 %
Days without rain 4
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Valencia de las Torres fire, June 2021
436 ha 1 day FWI 32.8 Min. humidity 16 % 97 km away, in 2021

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.4 mm on 12 Jun.

What happened to them

2 days
median duration
293 ha
median area
15 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.7 mm
rain at the end (median; 12 of 27 had it)

It stayed below its twins: 162 ha against a median of 293 ha. It lasted 1 day, against 2 days.

In 15 of 27, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.7 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
32km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 13 Jul, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 12 of 27, with a median of 1.7 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 6 Jul 2017
After · 20 Jul 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 13 July 2017 the air beside the fire reached 22 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 16: 1.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak22 µg/m³
Days over the guideline1 day
PM1044 µg/m³
11 Jul13 Jul15 Jul
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 6Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Spain

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Casas de Don Pedro fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 13 July 2017 and 13 July 2017: 1 day between the first and last image with fire. According to EGIF (MITECO), it was detected on 13 July 2017 at 13:00 and declared extinguished on 20 July 2017.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 162 hectares (1.6 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Casas de Don Pedro (162 ha, 1.1 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Casas de Don Pedro and came within 5.5 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 41.6 °C, humidity dropped to 15 % and gusts hit 32 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 33, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Spain (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 27. Their median duration was 2 days and their median area 293 ha; 15 % went past 1,000 ha. In 15 of 27, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.7 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 6 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • Compared with EGIF (MITECO): 159 official ha against 162 ha of perimeter; they agree within 25%.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.