Skip to content
worldfires
AO · Angola · –

Capenda-Camulemba fire, August 2018 Capenda-Camulemba

Out · last detection 2 Sept 2018, 12:04 UTC

The fire started on 27 August 2018 in Capenda-Camulemba, Angola, and satellites saw it burning for 7 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,637 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 213th largest in Lunda Norte since 2016 (of 297 with a page). Number 78 in Angola in 2018, of 100.

Burnt area
5,637ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
7days
27 Aug 2018 – 2 Sept 2018
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
27 Aug
2018
Heat detections
205
in a single hotspot: 127 MW
Danger at start
44
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
381MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 27 Aug2 Sept
2 Sept 2018

How it evolved, day by day

27 Aug 2018 · 6 MW · 5 28 Aug 2018 · 1,789 MW · 64 29 Aug 2018 · 271 MW · 45 30 Aug 2018 · 495 MW · 52 31 Aug 2018 · 61 MW · 28 1 Sept 2018 · 14 MW · 5 2 Sept 2018 · 30 MW · 6
28 Aug 31 Aug 2 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

33°high
51km/h · peak gust
17%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.9 mm on 5 Sept.

This area had burned before

84% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 3,097 ha in 2016, 3,958 ha in 2017. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 4,753 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.6% of the area of London (56 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Capenda-Camulemba where it started
    5,676 ha reached on 27 Aug
    0.6 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with 60 days without rain: 84 % of the area in Angola

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
27 Aug 32.9 °C 18 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
28 Aug 32.7 °C 17 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 70
29 Aug 32.2 °C 19 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
30 Aug 31.8 °C 23 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
31 Aug 32.3 °C 18 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
1 Sept 33.0 °C 17 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
2 Sept 33.0 °C 22 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
3 Sept after 33.4 °C 21 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
4 Sept after 32.6 °C 31 % 31 km/h 0.7 mm High 35
5 Sept after 30.3 °C 44 % 28 km/h 2.9 mm Low 11

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 44.4, a minimum humidity of 18% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 24.

FWI at the start 44.4
Minimum humidity 18 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Capenda-Camulemba fire, July 2016
6,458 ha 13 days FWI 43.4 Min. humidity 18 % 29 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

15 days
median duration
6,958 ha
median area
8 %
went past 10,000 ha
2.2 mm
rain at the end (median; 6 of 24 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (5,637 ha against a median of 6,958 ha) and lasted 7 days, against 15 days.

In 18 of 24, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.2 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

2.9 mmfirst rain
5 Sept3 days after it ended
51km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 2 Sept, and on 5 Sept 2.9 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 6 of 24, with a median of 2.2 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 20 Aug 2018
After · 9 Sept 2018

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 205Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Angola

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Capenda-Camulemba fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 27 August 2018 to 2 September 2018 (7 days). The perimeter dates it from 28 August 2018 to 2 September 2018.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,637 hectares (56.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Capenda-Camulemba (5,676 ha, 0.6 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 33.0 °C, humidity dropped to 17 % and gusts hit 51 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 70, class Very extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Angola (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 24. Their median duration was 15 days and their median area 6,958 ha; 8 % went past 10,000 ha. In 18 of 24, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.2 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Start date: 28 August 2018 → 27 August 2018.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 28 August 2018 to 2 September 2018. 205 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.