Burned area
satellite only5,051ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 12 Jul 2017 – 1 Aug 2017
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
AO · Angola · –
Capenda-Camulemba fire, 12 July 2017 Capenda-Camulemba
Out · last detection 2 Aug 2017, 12:29 UTC
The fire started on 12 July 2017 in Capenda-Camulemba, Angola, and satellites saw it burning for 21 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,051 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 289th largest in Lunda Norte since 2016 (of 297 with a page). Number 153 in Angola in 2017, of 158.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-26matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only21days
12 Jul 2017 to 1 Aug 2017: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 2 Aug 2017, 12:29 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only12 Jul 2017
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 12 Jul 2017
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only200
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 167 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 12 Jul 2017 – 1 Aug 2017
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only813MW
Total radiative power on 23 July 2017; hotspots that day: 30.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 23 Jul 2017
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model39.2FWI · very high
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 60.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 12 Jul 2017, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model32.7°C · 18% RH
High of 32.7 °C and minimum humidity of 18% on 1 August 2017; gusts of 40 km/h on 29 July 2017.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 12 Jul 2017 – 1 Aug 2017
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
logLast day with fire: 25 July 2017 → 1 August 2017.
-
logStart date: 13 July 2017 → 12 July 2017.
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 26 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 5,051 ha
- Dates
- 12 Jul 2017 – 1 Aug 2017
- Name
- Capenda-Camulemba
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/capenda-camulemba-2017-07?v=2026-10-26A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire capenda-camulemba-2017-07.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-12 | 9 | 113 | 30.3 | 17.5 | 23 | 11.6 | 27.4 | 0 | 39.2 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-13 | 10 | 49 | 29.8 | 16.4 | 20 | 10.5 | 21.2 | 0 | 38.4 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-14 | 9 | 413 | 30 | 14.4 | 23 | 11 | 20.9 | 0 | 39.1 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-15 | 9 | 474 | 30.3 | 14.3 | 21 | 10.2 | 16.9 | 0 | 38.6 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-16 | 2 | 55 | 29.9 | 16.3 | 21 | 10.7 | 19.8 | 0 | 39.3 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-17 | 0 | 0 | 31.6 | 16 | 16 | 14.2 | 32.8 | 0 | 43.7 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-18 | 14 | 117 | 31.6 | 18 | 19 | 14.7 | 39.6 | 0 | 44.5 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-19 | 21 | 626 | 31.6 | 17.7 | 19 | 14.1 | 30.2 | 0 | 44.1 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-20 | 4 | 99 | 31.6 | 17 | 23 | 12.2 | 23 | 0 | 42.1 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-21 | 21 | 408 | 31.1 | 17.3 | 16 | 11.5 | 33.8 | 0 | 41.7 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-22 | 19 | 303 | 31.2 | 16.2 | 20 | 10.8 | 19.8 | 0 | 41.2 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-23 | 30 | 813 | 32.5 | 15.7 | 17 | 9.2 | 19.8 | 0 | 39.9 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-24 | 6 | 220 | 32.2 | 15.1 | 20 | 11.1 | 21.2 | 0 | 42 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-25 | 13 | 374 | 32.4 | 16 | 14 | 12.1 | 29.5 | 0 | 44.1 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-26 | 10 | 574 | 30.2 | 14.6 | 20 | 12.2 | 30.2 | 0 | 43.8 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-27 | 0 | 0 | 30.5 | 18.5 | 23 | 13.3 | 35.6 | 0 | 43.2 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-28 | 0 | 0 | 30.7 | 18 | 20 | 15 | 37.8 | 0 | 45.2 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-29 | 6 | 75 | 29.6 | 16.7 | 21 | 14.8 | 40 | 0 | 45.2 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-30 | 2 | 28 | 30.3 | 17.2 | 19 | 13.6 | 37.1 | 0 | 44.1 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-07-31 | 0 | 0 | 31.7 | 16.6 | 19 | 12.9 | 30.2 | 0 | 43.6 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-08-01 | 8 | 53 | 32.7 | 17.7 | 18 | 11.2 | 24.1 | 0 | 42.1 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-08-02 | 7 | 33 | 29.7 | 17.3 | 24 | 13 | 26.3 | 0 | 41.9 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2017-08-03 | 0 | 0 | 32.7 | 19.4 | 18 | 12.4 | 34.6 | 0 | 41.6 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2017-08-04 | 0 | 0 | 33.2 | 19.7 | 18 | 11.3 | 25.2 | 0 | 40.8 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2017-08-05 | 0 | 0 | 30.3 | 18.9 | 28 | 9.5 | 22.3 | 0 | 36.5 | alto | 0 |
| 2017-08-06 | 0 | 0 | 31.5 | 17.4 | 18 | 11.9 | 33.8 | 0 | 40.2 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2017-08-07 | 0 | 0 | 32.3 | 17.9 | 18 | 11.5 | 30.2 | 0 | 40.4 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2017-08-08 | 0 | 0 | 31.8 | 19.5 | 22 | 10 | 22.7 | 0 | 39.2 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2017-08-09 | 0 | 0 | 31.2 | 17.4 | 17 | 13.7 | 33.1 | 0 | 43 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2017-08-10 | 0 | 0 | 30.3 | 17.2 | 17 | 14 | 26.3 | 0 | 43.5 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2017-08-11 | 0 | 0 | 30.4 | 16 | 15 | 13.8 | 38.2 | 0 | 44 | muy_alto | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 5,051ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 21days
- 12 Jul 2017 – 1 Aug 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 12 Jul
- 2017
- Heat detections
- 200
- in a single hotspot: 167 MW
- Danger at start
- 39
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 268MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
12 Jul1 Aug
2 Aug 2017
How it evolved, day by day
12 Jul
16 Jul
23 Jul
1 Aug
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
33°high
40km/h · peak gust
14%lowest humidity
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
64% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 3,487 ha in 2016. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 3,224 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Capenda-Camulemba where it started5,077 ha reached on 12 Jul0.5 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2015Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Started with 60 days without rain: 84 % of the area in Angola
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Jul | 30.3 °C | 23 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 13 Jul | 29.8 °C | 20 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 14 Jul | 30.0 °C | 23 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 15 Jul | 30.3 °C | 21 % | 17 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 16 Jul | 29.9 °C | 21 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 17 Jul | 31.6 °C | 16 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 18 Jul | 31.6 °C | 19 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 19 Jul | 31.6 °C | 19 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 20 Jul | 31.6 °C | 23 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 21 Jul | 31.1 °C | 16 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 22 Jul | 31.2 °C | 20 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 23 Jul | 32.5 °C | 17 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 24 Jul | 32.2 °C | 20 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 25 Jul | 32.4 °C | 14 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 26 Jul | 30.2 °C | 20 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 27 Jul | 30.5 °C | 23 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 28 Jul | 30.7 °C | 20 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 29 Jul | 29.6 °C | 21 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 30 Jul | 30.3 °C | 19 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 31 Jul | 31.7 °C | 19 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 1 Aug | 32.7 °C | 18 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 2 Aug after | 29.7 °C | 24 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 3 Aug after | 32.7 °C | 18 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 4 Aug after | 33.2 °C | 18 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 5 Aug after | 30.3 °C | 28 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 6 Aug after | 31.5 °C | 18 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 7 Aug after | 32.3 °C | 18 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 8 Aug after | 31.8 °C | 22 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 9 Aug after | 31.2 °C | 17 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 10 Aug after | 30.3 °C | 17 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 11 Aug after | 30.4 °C | 15 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 39.2, a minimum humidity of 23% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 18.
FWI at the start
39.2
Minimum humidity
23 %
Days without rain
60+
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Capenda-Camulemba fire, 12 July 2017
5,051 ha
21 days
FWI 39.2
Min. humidity 23 %
Capenda-Camulemba fire, August 2024
37,971 ha
22 days
FWI 38.2
Min. humidity 23 %
84 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Capenda-Camulemba fire, August 2016
7,490 ha
12 days
FWI 40.2
Min. humidity 22 %
26 km away, in 2016
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.3 mm on 22 Aug.
Capenda-Camulemba fire, July 2021
5,829 ha
19 days
FWI 40.6
Min. humidity 22 %
25 km away, in 2021
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 12.7 mm on 24 Aug.
Capenda-Camulemba fire, August 2016
12,490 ha
8 days
FWI 37.5
Min. humidity 24 %
18 km away, in 2016
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Cuilo fire, July 2025
6,060 ha
2 days
FWI 39.2
Min. humidity 23 %
187 km away, in 2025
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
- 15 days
- median duration
- 7,214 ha
- median area
- 22 %
- went past 10,000 ha
- 2.3 mm
- rain at the end (median; 5 of 18 had it)
It burned an area similar to its twins (5,051 ha against a median of 7,214 ha) and lasted 21 days, against 15 days.
In 13 of 18, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.3 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
—first rain
—no rain in ten days
40km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 1 Aug, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 5 of 18, with a median of 2.3 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 5 Jul 2017
After · 8 Aug 2017
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 200Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Capenda-Camulemba fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 12 July 2017 to 1 August 2017 (21 days). The perimeter dates it from 13 July 2017 to 25 July 2017.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,051 hectares (50.5 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Capenda-Camulemba (5,077 ha, 0.5 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 32.7 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 40 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 45, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Angola (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 18. Their median duration was 15 days and their median area 7,214 ha; 22 % went past 10,000 ha. In 13 of 18, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.3 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
- Last day with fire: 25 July 2017 → 1 August 2017.
- Start date: 13 July 2017 → 12 July 2017.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 13 July 2017 to 25 July 2017. 200 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.