Skip to content
worldfires
ES · Spain ·

Cabuérniga fire, 22 February 2021 Cabuérniga, Rionansa

Out · last measured on 22 Feb 2021

The fire started on 22 February 2021 in Cabuérniga, Spain, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 246 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 62th largest in Cantabria since 2016 (of 179 with a page). Number 51 in Spain in 2021, of 120.

We have the Copernicus perimeter for this fire, but the VIIRS sensors did not capture it in enough detail: no day-by-day evolution, but the split by municipality is there.

Burnt area
246ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
1day
22 Feb 2021 – 22 Feb 2021
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
22 Feb
2021
Danger at start
0
Very low · FWI index

Where it burned

The weather it burned in

11°high
38km/h · peak gust
59%lowest humidity

It had gone 0 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.1 mm on 25 Feb.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Cabuérniga 976 inhabitants · 3.1 km from the centre where it started
    245 ha
    2.8 %
  2. Rionansa 1,022 inhabitants · 5.2 km from the centre
    1 ha
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Other natural land76 %
  • Coniferous forest15 %
  • Broadleaved forest6.5 %
  • Scrub and transitional woodland3.2 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

Official record

Several official records match this area

According to EGIF (MITECO), 3 fires started inside this perimeter on these dates, totalling 310 ha (the satellite measured 246 ha). The two figures differ a lot, so these may not be exactly the same fire: take them as nearby records.

EGIF (MITECO) records each fire that started at a different time or place separately; the satellite sees a single burned area, so this page groups them together. The numbers on the map show where each one started.

When each one burned

1 8 ha 2 220 ha 3 82 ha
19 Feb22 Feb
arson
  1. 1 Cabuérniga Carmona /Andigón 19 February 2021 · 23:50 8 ha · extinguished on 20 February 2021 · cause: arson
  2. 2 Cabuérniga Carmona /Barculín 20 February 2021 · 05:15 220 ha · extinguished on 20 February 2021 · cause: arson
  3. 3 Cabuérniga Carmona /Las Riegas 21 February 2021 · 00:30 82 ha · extinguished on 21 February 2021 · cause: arson

Total according to EGIF (MITECO): 310 ha, 126 % of the 246 ha in the satellite perimeter.

MITECO, Estadística General de Incendios Forestales (EGIF). This is the agency’s consolidated statistic: it measures the area in its own way, which is why it can differ from the satellite.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
22 Feb 10.7 °C 59 % 38 km/h 9.0 mm Very low 0
23 Feb after 16.0 °C 32 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 0
24 Feb after 17.4 °C 39 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 1
25 Feb after 13.3 °C 61 % 32 km/h 2.1 mm Very low 0

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 0.0, a minimum humidity of 59% and rain the day before. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 50.

FWI at the start 0.0
Minimum humidity 59 %
Days without rain 0
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Rionansa fire, April 2024
626 ha 1 day FWI 0.0 Min. humidity 59 % 5 km away, in 2024

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 13.4 mm on 8 Apr.

What happened to them

1 day
median duration
144 ha
median area
2 %
went past 1,000 ha
5.2 mm
rain at the end (median; 48 of 50 had it)

It was 1.7 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 1 day, against 1 day.

Only 12 of its 50 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 2 of 50, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.2 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

2.1 mmfirst rain
25 Feb3 days after it ended
38km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 22 Feb, and on 25 Feb 2.1 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 48 of 50, with a median of 5.2 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 15 Feb 2021
After · 1 Mar 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 21 February 2021 the air beside the fire reached 38 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 20: 1.4 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak38 µg/m³
Days over the guideline2 days
PM1066 µg/m³
20 Feb22 Feb24 Feb
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Other fires nearby

All fires in Spain

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Cabuérniga fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 22 February 2021 and 22 February 2021: 1 day between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 246 hectares (2.5 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Cabuérniga (245 ha, 2.8 %); Rionansa (1 ha, 0.0 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Cabuérniga and came within 3.1 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 10.7 °C, humidity dropped to 59 % and gusts hit 38 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 0, class Very low.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Spain (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 50. Their median duration was 1 day and their median area 144 ha; 2 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 12 of its 50 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 2 of 50, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.2 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • Compared with EGIF (MITECO): 310 official ha against 246 ha of perimeter; similar, but with reservations.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.