Skip to content
worldfires
ES · Spain ·

Cabuérniga fire, 21 February 2021 Cabuérniga, Rionansa

Out · last measured on 21 Feb 2021

The fire started on 21 February 2021 in Cabuérniga, Spain, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 277 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 47th largest in Cantabria since 2016 (of 179 with a page). Number 45 in Spain in 2021, of 120.

We have the Copernicus perimeter for this fire, but the VIIRS sensors did not capture it in enough detail: no day-by-day evolution, but the split by municipality is there.

Burnt area
277ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
1day
21 Feb 2021 – 21 Feb 2021
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
21 Feb
2021
Danger at start
2
Very low · FWI index

Where it burned

The weather it burned in

14°high
44km/h · peak gust
48%lowest humidity

It had gone 2 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 7.6 mm on 22 Feb.

This area had burned before

40% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 54 ha in 2017, 53 ha in 2018, 3 ha in 2019, 2 ha in 2020.

What happened to each town

  1. Cabuérniga 976 inhabitants · 5.9 km from the centre where it started
    225 ha
    2.6 %
  2. Rionansa 1,022 inhabitants · 1.9 km from the centre
    53 ha
    0.4 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Other natural land88 %
  • Broadleaved forest9.1 %
  • Agricultural areas2.9 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

Official record

According to EGIF (MITECO), this fire started on 20 February 2021 and burned 250 ha (the satellite measured 277 ha).

MITECO, Estadística General de Incendios Forestales (EGIF). This is the agency’s consolidated statistic: it measures the area in its own way, which is why it can differ from the satellite.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
21 Feb 13.6 °C 48 % 44 km/h 11.3 mm Very low 2
22 Feb after 10.9 °C 59 % 38 km/h 7.6 mm Very low 0

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 1.6, a minimum humidity of 48% and 2 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 35.

FWI at the start 1.6
Minimum humidity 48 %
Days without rain 2
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Llanes fire, March 2025
100 ha 2 days FWI 0.9 Min. humidity 48 % 40 km away, in 2025

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 17.0 mm on 22 Mar.

What happened to them

2 days
median duration
173 ha
median area
0 %
went past 1,000 ha
5.5 mm
rain at the end (median; 35 of 35 had it)

It was 1.6 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 1 day, against 2 days.

Only 8 of its 35 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 5.5 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

7.6 mmfirst rain
22 Febthe day after it ended
44km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 21 Feb, and on 22 Feb 7.6 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 35 of 35, with a median of 5.5 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 14 Feb 2021
After · 28 Feb 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 21 February 2021 the air beside the fire reached 38 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 20: 1.4 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak38 µg/m³
Days over the guideline3 days
PM1069 µg/m³
19 Feb21 Feb23 Feb
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Other fires nearby

All fires in Spain

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Cabuérniga fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 21 February 2021 and 21 February 2021: 1 day between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 277 hectares (2.8 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Cabuérniga (225 ha, 2.6 %); Rionansa (53 ha, 0.4 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire came within 1.9 km of the centre of Rionansa, the closest of the areas it touched. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 13.6 °C, humidity dropped to 48 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 2, class Very low.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Spain (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 35. Their median duration was 2 days and their median area 173 ha; 0 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 8 of its 35 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 5.5 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • Compared with EGIF (MITECO): 250 official ha against 277 ha of perimeter; they agree within 25%.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.