Cabo Corrientes fire, June 2023 Cabo Corrientes
The fire started on 12 June 2023 in Cabo Corrientes, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 15 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,445 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 132th largest in Jalisco since 2016 (of 283 with a page). Number 136 in Mexico in 2023, of 286.
The power measured by the satellite is low (14.8 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
- Burnt area
- 2,445ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 15days
- 12 Jun 2023 – 26 Jun 2023
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 12 Jun
- 2023
- Heat detections
- 172
- in a single hotspot: 15 MW
- Danger at start
- 17
- Moderate · FWI index
- Energy released
- 549MW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 4.9 mm on 27 Jun.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
-
Cabo Corrientes where it started2,458 ha reached on 12 Jun1.6 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
Official record
According to CONAFOR, this fire started on 14 June 2023 and burned 1,442 ha (the satellite measured 2,445 ha). The two figures differ a lot, so these may not be exactly the same fire: take them as nearby records.
- Cabo Corrientes La Tordilla 14 June 2023 1,442 ha · extinguished on 22 June 2023 · cause: arson
CONAFOR (Comisión Nacional Forestal), estadística de incendios forestales en datos.gob.mx (CC BY 4.0). This is the agency’s consolidated statistic: it measures the area in its own way, which is why it can differ from the satellite.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun | 25.2 °C | 66 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 17 |
| 10 Jun | 26.3 °C | 67 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 15 |
| 11 Jun | 26.4 °C | 64 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 15 |
| 12 Jun | 26.4 °C | 64 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 13 Jun | 27.0 °C | 66 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 14 Jun | 26.7 °C | 63 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 15 Jun | 26.9 °C | 55 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 16 Jun | 27.4 °C | 48 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 17 Jun | 27.9 °C | 58 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 18 Jun | 27.8 °C | 59 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 19 Jun | 28.0 °C | 63 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 20 Jun | 28.5 °C | 54 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 21 Jun | 27.6 °C | 49 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 21 |
| 22 Jun | 27.3 °C | 56 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 23 Jun | 26.9 °C | 62 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 24 Jun | 27.4 °C | 60 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 25 Jun | 27.0 °C | 65 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 26 Jun | 27.5 °C | 67 % | 38 km/h | 1.6 mm | Low 8 |
| 27 Jun after | 28.8 °C | 58 % | 25 km/h | 4.9 mm | Very low 3 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 11 June 2023 the air beside the fire reached 35 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 30: 2.0 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 172Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 4,635 haCabo CorrientesApril 2026 · 16 days · 9 km away
- 6,135 haCabo Corrientes30 April 2023 · 13 days · 14 km away
- 7,719 haTomatlánApril 2025 · 4 days · 16 km away
- 11,252 haTalpa de AllendeMarch 2023 · 30 days · 20 km away
- 4,315 haTalpa de AllendeMay 2020 · 9 days · 25 km away
- 12,266 haCabo Corrientes26 April 2023 · 12 days · 27 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Cabo Corrientes fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 12 June 2023 and 26 June 2023: 15 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,445 hectares (24.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Cabo Corrientes (2,458 ha, 1.6 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 28.5 °C, humidity dropped to 48 % and gusts hit 43 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 22, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.