Burned area
satellite only540ha
Perimeter published by EFFIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- EFFIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- perimeter revised on 2 March 2022
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
RO · Romania ·
C.A. Rosetti fire, March 2019 C.A. Rosetti
Out · last detection 24 Mar 2019, 10:32 UTC
The fire started on 24 March 2019 in C.A. Rosetti, Romania, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 540 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality.
This record is fire in the reed beds of the Danube Delta, not a forest fire. Thousands of hectares of reed burn in the delta every year, mostly between January and April, and many of these burns are deliberate. That is why it is left out of the fire rankings.
The power measured by the satellite is low (27.3 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only1day
24 Mar 2019 to 24 Mar 2019: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- EFFIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 24 Mar 2019, 10:32 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only24 Mar 2019
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- EFFIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 24 Mar 2019
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only9
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 27 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 24 Mar 2019 – 24 Mar 2019
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only159MW
Total radiative power on 24 March 2019; hotspots that day: 9.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 24 Mar 2019
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model10.8FWI · low
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 11.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 24 Mar 2019, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model13.7°C · 30% RH
High of 13.7 °C and minimum humidity of 30% on 24 March 2019; gusts of 32 km/h on 24 March 2019.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 24 Mar 2019 – 24 Mar 2019
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed perimeterEFFIS (Copernicus) revises the perimeter
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 540 ha
- Dates
- 24 Mar 2019 – 24 Mar 2019
- Name
- C.A. Rosetti
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/c-a-rosetti-tulcea-2019-03?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire c-a-rosetti-tulcea-2019-03.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-24 | 9 | 159 | 13.7 | 1.8 | 30 | 19.1 | 32 | 0 | 10.8 | bajo | 1 |
| 2019-03-25 | 0 | 0 | 18.4 | 4.9 | 31 | 25.8 | 49.3 | 0 | 13.7 | moderado | 0 |
| 2019-03-26 | 0 | 0 | 10.8 | 6.1 | 54 | 21.4 | 40.3 | 1.2 | 3.8 | muy_bajo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: EFFIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 540ha
- Copernicus perimeter
- Duration
- 1day
- 24 Mar 2019 – 24 Mar 2019
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 24 Mar
- 2019
- Heat detections
- 9
- in a single hotspot: 27 MW
- Danger at start
- 11
- Low · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 159MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
24 Mar24 Mar
How it evolved, day by day
24 Mar 2019 · 159 MW · 9
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
14°high
32km/h · peak gust
30%lowest humidity
It had gone 11 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.2 mm on 26 Mar.
This area had burned before
98% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 32 ha in 2016, 529 ha in 2017. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 531 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Bucharest boundary: geoBoundaries · World Bank (CC BY 4.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
540 ha reached on 24 Mar2.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
What burned
- Other natural land100 %
Natura 2000 protected area affected: 100 %
- LIC Delta Dunării ROSCI0065
- ZEPA Delta Dunării și Complexul Razim - Sinoie ROSPA0031
Natura 2000 sites (European Environment Agency, 2024 release) crossed by the perimeter.
Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Mar | 13.7 °C | 30 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 11 |
| 25 Mar after | 18.4 °C | 31 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 26 Mar after | 10.8 °C | 54 % | 40 km/h | 1.2 mm | Very low 4 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 10.8, a minimum humidity of 30% and 11 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2017: 19.
FWI at the start
10.8
Minimum humidity
30 %
Days without rain
11
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · C.A. Rosetti fire, March 2019
540 ha
1 day
FWI 10.8
Min. humidity 30 %
Tudor Vladimirescu fire, April 2025
102 ha
1 day
FWI 11.0
Min. humidity 32 %
139 km away, in 2025
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.1 mm on 19 Apr.
Crișan fire, November 2017
144 ha
3 days
FWI 11.8
Min. humidity 33 %
22 km away, in 2017
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.8 mm on 9 Nov.
Ceamurlia de Jos fire, March 2019
132 ha
1 day
FWI 8.4
Min. humidity 29 %
87 km away, in 2019
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 15.2 mm on 12 Mar.
Berteștii de Jos fire, March 2022
507 ha
4 days
FWI 11.6
Min. humidity 28 %
136 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 3.7 mm on 2 Apr.
Artsyi fire, March 2022
224 ha
1 day
FWI 4.8
Min. humidity 28 %
51 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.7 mm on 25 Mar.
What happened to them
- 2 days
- median duration
- 144 ha
- median area
- 0 %
- went past 1,000 ha
- 2.2 mm
- rain at the end (median; 18 of 19 had it)
It was 3.8 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 1 day, against 2 days.
None of its 19 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 1 of 19, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.2 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
1.2 mmfirst rain
26 Mar2 days after it ended
32km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 24 Mar, and on 26 Mar 1.2 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 18 of 19, with a median of 2.2 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2017.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 17 Mar 2019
After · 31 Mar 2019
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 24 March 2019 the air beside the fire reached 102 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 37: 2.4 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
PM2.5 peak102 µg/m³
Days over the guideline4 days
PM10116 µg/m³
WHO 15
22 Mar24 Mar26 Mar
Good
Fair
Moderate
Poor
Very poor
Extremely poor
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 9Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 7,692 haSulina20 March 2022 · 9 days · 6 km away
- 6,700 haChilia Veche31 March 2022 · 4 days · 10 km away
- 7,618 haSulina14 February 2025 · 7 days · 17 km away
- 6,252 haKiliia Кілійський район24 March 2022 · 9 days · 18 km away
- 5,149 haKiliia Кілійський район3 January 2026 · 1 day · 18 km away
- 6,060 haSfântu GheorgheJanuary 2022 · 4 days · 28 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the C.A. Rosetti fire last?
- Copernicus dates it between 24 March 2019 and 24 March 2019: 1 day between the first and last image with fire.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 540 hectares (5.4 km²). Official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered C.A. Rosetti (540 ha, 2.0 %).
- Did the fire reach a town?
- The fire started in C.A. Rosetti and came within 3.8 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 13.7 °C, humidity dropped to 30 % and gusts hit 32 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 11, class Low.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Romania (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2017 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 19. Their median duration was 2 days and their median area 144 ha; 0 % went past 1,000 ha. None of its 19 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 1 of 19, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.2 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 9 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Probably a vegetation burn: not counted in the totals.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.