Burned area
satellite only1,135ha
Perimeter published by MTBS (USGS/USFS).
- Source
- MTBS (USGS/USFS)
- Date
- 9 Feb 2017 – 9 Feb 2017
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
US · United States ·
Bulldog Fire, February 2017 Torrance
Out · last measured on 9 Feb 2017
The fire started on 9 February 2017 in Torrance, United States, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. United States agencies (MTBS / NIFC) mapped an official burnt perimeter of 1,135 hectares, spread across a single county.
It is the 113th largest in New Mexico since 2016 (of 204 with a page). Number 361 in United States in 2017, of 619.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only1day
9 Feb 2017 to 9 Feb 2017: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- MTBS (USGS/USFS) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 9 Feb 2017 – 9 Feb 2017
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only9 Feb 2017
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- MTBS (USGS/USFS) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 9 Feb 2017
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Danger at the start
model21.5FWI · high
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 18.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 9 Feb 2017, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model18.8°C · 17% RH
High of 18.8 °C and minimum humidity of 17% on 9 February 2017; gusts of 48 km/h on 9 February 2017.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 9 Feb 2017 – 9 Feb 2017
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 1,135 ha
- Dates
- 9 Feb 2017 – 9 Feb 2017
- Name
- Bulldog
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/bulldog-fire-2017-02?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire bulldog-fire-2017-02.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-09 | 0 | 0 | 18.8 | 2.6 | 17 | 28.6 | 47.9 | 0 | 21.5 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-02-10 | 0 | 0 | 22.1 | 4.7 | 12 | 33.7 | 55.4 | 0 | 35.4 | alto | 0 |
| 2017-02-11 | 0 | 0 | 21.7 | 7.2 | 12 | 33.4 | 55.4 | 0 | 38.8 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2017-02-12 | 0 | 0 | 9.1 | -2.2 | 33 | 41.6 | 68 | 2 | 31.1 | alto | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: MTBS (USGS/USFS), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
We have the official perimeter (MTBS / NIFC) for this fire, but the VIIRS sensors did not capture it in enough detail: no day-by-day evolution, but the split by county is there.
- Burnt area
- 1,135ha
- official perimeter (MTBS / NIFC)
- Duration
- 1day
- 9 Feb 2017 – 9 Feb 2017
- Counties hit
- 1
- counties
- Started on
- 9 Feb
- 2017
- Danger at start
- 22
- High · FWI index
Where it burned
The weather it burned in
19°high
48km/h · peak gust
17%lowest humidity
It had gone 18 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.0 mm on 12 Feb.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each county
-
Torrance where it started1,141 ha0.1 %
Burnt area inside each county, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2015Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Feb | 18.8 °C | 17 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 10 Feb after | 22.1 °C | 12 % | 55 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 11 Feb after | 21.7 °C | 12 % | 55 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 12 Feb after | 9.1 °C | 33 % | 68 km/h | 2.0 mm | High 31 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 21.5, a minimum humidity of 17% and 18 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 19.
FWI at the start
21.5
Minimum humidity
17 %
Days without rain
18
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Bulldog Fire, February 2017
1,135 ha
1 day
FWI 21.5
Min. humidity 17 %
Valentine Complex, February 2016
769 ha
4 days
FWI 21.7
Min. humidity 16 %
239 km away, in 2016
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 3.3 mm on 22 Feb.
Bruton Fire, February 2016
968 ha
1 day
FWI 20.7
Min. humidity 16 %
220 km away, in 2016
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Amole Fire, September 2019
813 ha
31 days
FWI 21.0
Min. humidity 18 %
160 km away, in 2019
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 9.5 mm on 4 Oct.
Cuervito Fire, May 2021
680 ha
20 days
FWI 27.1
Min. humidity 18 %
85 km away, in 2021
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 10.8 mm on 30 May.
Truck Fire, February 2016
2,052 ha
2 days
FWI 28.6
Min. humidity 18 %
93 km away, in 2016
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
- 10 days
- median duration
- 1,143 ha
- median area
- 53 %
- went past 1,000 ha
- 2.9 mm
- rain at the end (median; 17 of 19 had it)
It burned an area similar to its twins (1,135 ha against a median of 1,143 ha) and lasted 1 day, against 10 days.
In 2 of 19, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.9 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
2.0 mmfirst rain
12 Feb3 days after it ended
48km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 9 Feb, and on 12 Feb 2.0 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 17 of 19, with a median of 2.9 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 2 Feb 2017
After · 16 Feb 2017
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Bulldog Fire last?
- It burned between 9 February 2017 and 9 February 2017: 1 day, according to the start date recorded by United States agencies (MTBS / NIFC) and the heat detections seen by satellite.
- How much area did it burn?
- The official perimeter published by United States agencies (MTBS / NIFC) is 1,135 hectares (11.4 km²). Other tallies, such as daily incident reports, may give slightly different figures.
- Which counties burned?
- The fire only entered Torrance (1,141 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 18.8 °C, humidity dropped to 17 % and gusts hit 48 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 22, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the official burnt perimeter of United States agencies (MTBS / NIFC, public domain), NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of United States. It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 19. Their median duration was 10 days and their median area 1,143 ha; 53 % went past 1,000 ha. In 2 of 19, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.9 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings
- NIFC · National Interagency Fire Center ↗
- InciWeb · Incident Information System ↗
- MTBS · Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity ↗
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: MTBS (US Geological Survey and US Forest Service), official.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter is official and in the public domain. For past years it comes from MTBS (Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity), run by the U.S. Geological Survey and the USDA Forest Service, which map it on Landsat and Sentinel-2 imagery. For the current and last year it comes from WFIGS at the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC): incident perimeters mapped by fire crews, aircraft and imagery. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. County boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per county is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from official figures.