Burned area
satellite only2,909ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 21 Feb 2025 – 26 Feb 2025
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
SN · Senegal · –
Bouinguel Bamba fire, February 2025 Bouinguel Bamba, Dianké Makan
Out · last detection 26 Feb 2025, 02:26 UTC
The fire started on 21 February 2025 in Bouinguel Bamba, Senegal, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,909 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 85th largest in Tambacounda since 2016 (of 222 with a page). Number 21 in Senegal in 2025, of 45.
The power measured by the satellite is low (22.4 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only6days
21 Feb 2025 to 26 Feb 2025: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 26 Feb 2025, 02:26 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only21 Feb 2025
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 21 Feb 2025
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only56
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 22 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 21 Feb 2025 – 26 Feb 2025
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only59MW
Total radiative power on 21 February 2025; hotspots that day: 11.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 21 Feb 2025
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model51.2FWI · extreme
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 60.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 21 Feb 2025, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model38.7°C · 14% RH
High of 38.7 °C and minimum humidity of 14% on 21 February 2025; gusts of 47 km/h on 25 February 2025.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 21 Feb 2025 – 26 Feb 2025
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
Living inside
model≈ 550people
Estimated residents inside the perimeter and 2.5 ha of built-up area (100 m grid, epoch 2025).
- Source
- GHSL R2023A · JRC
- Date
- calculated on 24 October 2026
+− cross-check
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 2,909 ha
- Dates
- 21 Feb 2025 – 26 Feb 2025
- Name
- Bouinguel Bamba
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/bouinguel-bamba-2025-02?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire bouinguel-bamba-2025-02.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-21 | 11 | 59 | 38.7 | 22 | 14 | 13.5 | 30.6 | 0 | 51.2 | extremo | 1 |
| 2025-02-22 | 13 | 41 | 35.9 | 23.9 | 18 | 19.9 | 40 | 0 | 57.7 | extremo | 1 |
| 2025-02-23 | 7 | 34 | 35.5 | 22.8 | 18 | 19.6 | 41 | 0 | 56.9 | extremo | 1 |
| 2025-02-24 | 14 | 52 | 35.2 | 22.1 | 16 | 20.8 | 41.8 | 0 | 58.8 | extremo | 1 |
| 2025-02-25 | 10 | 40 | 34.2 | 22.4 | 16 | 22.8 | 47.2 | 0 | 61.9 | extremo | 1 |
| 2025-02-26 | 1 | 2 | 34.5 | 21 | 16 | 19.7 | 41.4 | 0 | 58.1 | extremo | 1 |
| 2025-02-27 | 0 | 0 | 36.9 | 19.4 | 14 | 15.9 | 34.6 | 0 | 53.6 | extremo | 0 |
| 2025-02-28 | 0 | 0 | 38.6 | 19.8 | 15 | 11.4 | 21.2 | 0 | 48.6 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-03-01 | 0 | 0 | 38.8 | 21.8 | 18 | 9.8 | 18.7 | 0 | 47.1 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-03-02 | 0 | 0 | 39.2 | 24.4 | 15 | 14.7 | 27.4 | 0 | 53.1 | extremo | 0 |
| 2025-03-03 | 0 | 0 | 33.7 | 23.7 | 26 | 17.1 | 33.5 | 0 | 47.6 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-03-04 | 0 | 0 | 35.8 | 23.8 | 23 | 14.5 | 31.3 | 0 | 45.1 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-03-05 | 0 | 0 | 37.8 | 23.1 | 23 | 14.6 | 30.6 | 0 | 45.5 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-03-06 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 24.6 | 24 | 17.7 | 37.8 | 0 | 49.1 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-03-07 | 0 | 0 | 39.4 | 25.3 | 20 | 14.6 | 32 | 0 | 46.4 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-03-08 | 0 | 0 | 40.3 | 26.9 | 18 | 15.8 | 35.6 | 0 | 50.2 | extremo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 2,909ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 6days
- 21 Feb 2025 – 26 Feb 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- districts
- Started on
- 21 Feb
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 56
- in a single hotspot: 22 MW
- Danger at start
- 51
- Extreme · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 38MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
21 Feb26 Feb
26 Feb 2025
How it evolved, day by day
21 Feb
23 Feb
25 Feb
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
39°high
47km/h · peak gust
14%lowest humidity
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
11% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 4 ha in 2020, 311 ha in 2022.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Bouinguel Bamba where it started1,727 ha reached on 21 Feb0.6 %
-
1,201 ha reached on 24 Feb0.4 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Built-up area2.5 ha
Residents≈ 550
Inside the perimeter there were about 2.5 hectares of built-up land and about 550 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Started with Very dry air: 43 % of the area in Senegal 60 days without rain: 79 % of the area in Senegal
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Feb | 38.7 °C | 14 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 22 Feb | 35.9 °C | 18 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 23 Feb | 35.5 °C | 18 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 24 Feb | 35.2 °C | 16 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 25 Feb | 34.2 °C | 16 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 26 Feb | 34.5 °C | 16 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 27 Feb after | 36.9 °C | 14 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 28 Feb after | 38.6 °C | 15 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 1 Mar after | 38.8 °C | 18 % | 19 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 2 Mar after | 39.2 °C | 15 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 3 Mar after | 33.7 °C | 26 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 4 Mar after | 35.8 °C | 23 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 5 Mar after | 37.8 °C | 23 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 6 Mar after | 37.0 °C | 24 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 7 Mar after | 39.4 °C | 20 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 8 Mar after | 40.3 °C | 18 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 51.2, a minimum humidity of 14% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 39.
FWI at the start
51.2
Minimum humidity
14 %
Days without rain
60+
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Bouinguel Bamba fire, February 2025
2,909 ha
6 days
FWI 51.2
Min. humidity 14 %
Bandafassi fire, January 2021
9,627 ha
10 days
FWI 51.1
Min. humidity 14 %
116 km away, in 2021
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Missira fire, January 2024
4,613 ha
10 days
FWI 50.9
Min. humidity 15 %
53 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Bandafassi fire, January 2025
32,579 ha
20 days
FWI 50.8
Min. humidity 14 %
112 km away, in 2025
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Dianké Makan fire, January 2025
2,207 ha
4 days
FWI 49.4
Min. humidity 14 %
72 km away, in 2025
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Bandafassi fire, January 2019
2,187 ha
10 days
FWI 49.8
Min. humidity 14 %
103 km away, in 2019
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
- 5 days
- median duration
- 2,636 ha
- median area
- 100 %
- went past 1,000 ha
- —
- rain at the end (median; 0 of 39 had it)
It burned an area similar to its twins (2,909 ha against a median of 2,636 ha) and lasted 6 days, against 5 days.
In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
—first rain
—no rain in ten days
47km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 26 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. None of its 39 twins had rain when they ended.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 14 Feb 2025
After · 5 Mar 2025
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 22 February 2025 the air beside the fire reached 144 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 116: 7.7 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
PM2.5 peak144 µg/m³
Days over the guideline11 days
PM10782 µg/m³
Optical depth0.69
WHO 15
19 Feb22 Feb25 Feb28 Feb
Good
Fair
Moderate
Poor
Very poor
Extremely poor
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 56Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 4,356 haBalaMarch 2026 · 4 days · 10 km away
- 4,928 haBala23 October 2025 · 18 days · 14 km away
- 4,620 haBouinguel BambaOctober 2025 · 14 days · 27 km away
- 4,721 haBalaJanuary 2017 · 9 days · 30 km away
- 4,276 haBala November 2026 · 4 days · 32 km away
- 9,228 haBouinguel Bamba1 November 2022 · 16 days · 39 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Bouinguel Bamba fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 21 February 2025 and 26 February 2025: 6 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,909 hectares (29.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Bouinguel Bamba (1,727 ha, 0.6 %); Dianké Makan (1,201 ha, 0.4 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 38.7 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 47 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 62, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Senegal (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 39. Their median duration was 5 days and their median area 2,636 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 18 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 56 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.