Skip to content
worldfires
TH · Thailand · –

Ban Khok fire, February 2023 บ้านโคก · Ban Khok, Fak Tha

Out · last detection 2 Mar 2023, 05:41 UTC

The fire started on 17 February 2023 in Ban Khok, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 14 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,856 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 17th largest in Uttaradit Province since 2016 (of 78 with a page). Number 121 in Thailand in 2023, of 369.

The power measured by the satellite is low (7.9 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
1,856ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
14days
17 Feb 2023 – 2 Mar 2023
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
17 Feb
2023
Heat detections
61
in a single hotspot: 8 MW
Danger at start
26
High · FWI index
Average daily power
10MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 17 Feb2 Mar
2 Mar 2023

How it evolved, day by day

17 Feb 2023 · 5 MW · 2 18 Feb 2023 · 2 MW · 2 19 Feb 2023 · 8 MW · 1 20 Feb 2023 · 9 MW · 3 21 Feb 2023 · 2 MW · 2 22 Feb 2023 · 62 MW · 28 23 Feb 2023 · 14 MW · 8 24 Feb 2023 · 7 MW · 5 25 Feb 2023 · 2 MW · 2 26 Feb 2023 · 7 MW · 2 27 Feb 2023 · 1 MW · 1 28 Feb 2023 · 6 MW · 4 2 Mar 2023 · 6 MW · 1
17 Feb 22 Feb 26 Feb 2 Mar

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

34°high
53km/h · peak gust
27%lowest humidity

It had gone 12 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

39% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 44 ha in 2016, 449 ha in 2017, 229 ha in 2018, 83 ha in 2019, 1 ha in 2020, 269 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 730 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.2% of the area of London (19 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Ban Khok บ้านโคก where it started
    1,215 ha reached on 17 Feb
    1.2 %
  2. Fak Tha ฟากท่า
    649 ha reached on 21 Feb
    1.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
17 Feb 27.3 °C 45 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
18 Feb 28.6 °C 44 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
19 Feb 32.0 °C 37 % 30 km/h 0.2 mm High 27
20 Feb 31.4 °C 37 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
21 Feb 31.5 °C 34 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
22 Feb 31.0 °C 38 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
23 Feb 33.1 °C 31 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
24 Feb 33.8 °C 30 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
25 Feb 29.6 °C 38 % 53 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
26 Feb 28.1 °C 34 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
27 Feb 28.1 °C 27 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
28 Feb 31.0 °C 33 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
1 Mar 33.9 °C 28 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
2 Mar 31.6 °C 37 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
3 Mar after 31.3 °C 34 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
4 Mar after 30.1 °C 38 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
5 Mar after 30.4 °C 39 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
6 Mar after 31.5 °C 38 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
7 Mar after 33.8 °C 33 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
8 Mar after 35.2 °C 30 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
9 Mar after 33.2 °C 40 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
10 Mar after 33.6 °C 42 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
11 Mar after 34.3 °C 41 % 17 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
12 Mar after 34.0 °C 40 % 30 km/h 0.3 mm High 31

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 25.9, a minimum humidity of 45% and 12 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 50.

FWI at the start 25.9
Minimum humidity 45 %
Days without rain 12
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Phu Luang fire, March 2023
3,117 ha 8 days FWI 27.0 Min. humidity 45 % 105 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 3.9 mm on 9 Apr.

What happened to them

9 days
median duration
1,478 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.8 mm
rain at the end (median; 40 of 50 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (1,856 ha against a median of 1,478 ha) and lasted 14 days, against 9 days.

In 10 of 50, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.8 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
53km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 2 Mar, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 40 of 50, with a median of 1.8 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 10 Feb 2023
After · 9 Mar 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 19 February 2023 the air beside the fire reached 40 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 29: 1.9 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak40 µg/m³
Days over the guideline9 days
PM1059 µg/m³
Optical depth0.88
18 Feb20 Feb22 Feb24 Feb26 Feb
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 61Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Thailand

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Ban Khok fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 17 February 2023 to 2 March 2023 (14 days). The perimeter dates it from 20 February 2023 to 24 February 2023.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,856 hectares (18.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Ban Khok (1,215 ha, 1.2 %); Fak Tha (649 ha, 1.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 33.9 °C, humidity dropped to 27 % and gusts hit 53 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 41, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 50. Their median duration was 9 days and their median area 1,478 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 10 of 50, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.8 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 199 · 191 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 24 February 2023 → 2 March 2023.
  2. Start date: 20 February 2023 → 17 February 2023.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 199 · 191.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 20 February 2023 to 24 February 2023. 61 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.