Skip to content
worldfires
KZ · Kazakhstan · –

Ayagozskiy fire, April 2023 Alakolskiy, Ayagozskiy

Out · last detection 3 Apr 2023, 07:31 UTC

The fire started on 1 April 2023 in Ayagozskiy, Kazakhstan, and satellites saw it burning for 3 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,340 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 76th largest in East Kazakhstan Region since 2016 (of 81 with a page). Number 10 in Kazakhstan in 2023, of 13.

Burnt area
3,340ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
3days
1 Apr 2023 – 3 Apr 2023
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
1 Apr
2023
Heat detections
109
in a single hotspot: 121 MW
Danger at start
12
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
799MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 1 Apr3 Apr
3 Apr 2023

How it evolved, day by day

1 Apr 2023 · 732 MW · 28 2 Apr 2023 · 1,612 MW · 71 3 Apr 2023 · 54 MW · 10
1 Apr 2 Apr 3 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

10°high
60km/h · peak gust
23%lowest humidity

It had gone 19 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 3.4 mm on 7 Apr.

This area had burned before

2% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 58 ha in 2017.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.1% of the area of London (33 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Alakolskiy Алакөл ауданы
    1,992 ha reached on 2 Apr
    0.0 %
  2. Ayagozskiy where it started
    1,357 ha reached on 1 Apr
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Strong wind: 19 % of the area in Kazakhstan

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
1 Apr 5.0 °C 26 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 12
2 Apr 6.9 °C 24 % 60 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 14
3 Apr 10.0 °C 23 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 13
4 Apr after 15.0 °C 17 % 65 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
5 Apr after 18.0 °C 16 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 18
6 Apr after 19.3 °C 18 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
7 Apr after 17.0 °C 40 % 41 km/h 3.4 mm Very low 2

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 11.7, a minimum humidity of 26% and 19 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2017: 13.

FWI at the start 11.7
Minimum humidity 26 %
Days without rain 19
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Ayagozskiy fire, March 2020
4,473 ha 8 days FWI 7.1 Min. humidity 29 % 25 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 13. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

3.4 mmfirst rain
7 Apr4 days after it ended
60km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 3 Apr, and on 7 Apr 3.4 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2017.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 25 Mar 2023
After · 10 Apr 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 6 April 2023 the air beside the fire reached 18 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak18 µg/m³
Days over the guideline0 days
PM1041 µg/m³
Optical depth0.69
30 Mar1 Apr3 Apr5 Apr
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 109Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Kazakhstan

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Ayagozskiy fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 1 April 2023 and 3 April 2023: 3 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,340 hectares (33.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Alakolskiy (1,992 ha, 0.0 %); Ayagozskiy (1,357 ha, 0.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 10.0 °C, humidity dropped to 23 % and gusts hit 60 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 14, class Moderate.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Kazakhstan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 109 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.