Skip to content
worldfires
SD · Sudan · –

As Salam - WK fire, December 2016 As Salam - WK

Out · last detection 16 Dec 2016, 10:48 UTC

The fire started on 8 December 2016 in As Salam - WK, Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 9 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,289 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 25th largest in West Kordofan since 2016 (of 101 with a page). Number 63 in Sudan in 2016, of 169.

Burnt area
3,289ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
9days
8 Dec 2016 – 16 Dec 2016
Municipalities hit
1
localities
Started on
8 Dec
2016
Heat detections
93
in a single hotspot: 45 MW
Danger at start
64
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
51MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 8 Dec16 Dec
16 Dec 2016

How it evolved, day by day

9 Dec 2016 · 206 MW · 34 10 Dec 2016 · 48 MW · 14 11 Dec 2016 · 22 MW · 7 12 Dec 2016 · 16 MW · 4 13 Dec 2016 · 14 MW · 4 14 Dec 2016 · 17 MW · 9 15 Dec 2016 · 47 MW · 15 16 Dec 2016 · 36 MW · 6
9 Dec 11 Dec 13 Dec 15 Dec

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
44km/h · peak gust
9%lowest humidity

It had gone 57 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.1% of the area of London (33 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. As Salam - WK where it started
    3,302 ha reached on 9 Dec
    0.4 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Very dry air: 55 % of the area in Sudan

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
8 Dec 37.4 °C 9 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
9 Dec 37.0 °C 13 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
10 Dec 37.3 °C 13 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
11 Dec 36.4 °C 12 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
12 Dec 36.9 °C 14 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 65
13 Dec 37.5 °C 11 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
14 Dec 35.2 °C 9 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 68
15 Dec 34.7 °C 11 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
16 Dec 34.6 °C 12 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
17 Dec after 34.2 °C 12 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
18 Dec after 36.1 °C 14 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 65
19 Dec after 36.6 °C 13 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 68
20 Dec after 36.4 °C 14 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 70
21 Dec after 36.6 °C 13 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 67
22 Dec after 37.4 °C 12 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
23 Dec after 38.7 °C 13 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 61
24 Dec after 38.4 °C 16 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 68
25 Dec after 34.5 °C 16 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 65
26 Dec after 33.2 °C 13 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 63

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 64.3, a minimum humidity of 9% and 57 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 36.

FWI at the start 64.3
Minimum humidity 9 %
Days without rain 57
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Al Buram fire, February 2020
2,127 ha 6 days FWI 64.5 Min. humidity 9 % 157 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

6 days
median duration
2,625 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.6 mm
rain at the end (median; 1 of 36 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (3,289 ha against a median of 2,625 ha) and lasted 9 days, against 6 days.

In 35 of 36, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.6 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
44km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 16 Dec, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 1 of 36, with a median of 1.6 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 1 Dec 2016
After · 23 Dec 2016

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 93Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Sudan

Frequently asked questions

How long did the As Salam - WK fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 8 December 2016 and 16 December 2016: 9 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,289 hectares (32.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered As Salam - WK (3,302 ha, 0.4 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 37.5 °C, humidity dropped to 9 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 68, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 36. Their median duration was 6 days and their median area 2,625 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 35 of 36, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.6 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 93 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.