Skip to content
worldfires
NG · Nigeria · –

Anambra West fire, February 2017 Anambra West, Ibaji, Anambra East

Out · last detection 26 Feb 2017, 13:18 UTC

The fire started on 4 February 2017 in Anambra West, Nigeria, and satellites saw it burning for 23 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 6,767 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.

Number 13 in Nigeria in 2017, of 143.

Burnt area
6,767ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
23days
4 Feb 2017 – 26 Feb 2017
Municipalities hit
3
local government areas
Started on
4 Feb
2017
Heat detections
357
in a single hotspot: 52 MW
Danger at start
43
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
194MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 4 Feb26 Feb
26 Feb 2017

How it evolved, day by day

4 Feb 2017 · 5 MW · 2 5 Feb 2017 · 65 MW · 7 6 Feb 2017 · 8 MW · 3 7 Feb 2017 · 92 MW · 5 8 Feb 2017 · 10 MW · 3 10 Feb 2017 · 60 MW · 8 11 Feb 2017 · 91 MW · 11 12 Feb 2017 · 47 MW · 3 13 Feb 2017 · 121 MW · 7 14 Feb 2017 · 995 MW · 76 15 Feb 2017 · 716 MW · 47 16 Feb 2017 · 269 MW · 36 17 Feb 2017 · 821 MW · 86 18 Feb 2017 · 176 MW · 26 19 Feb 2017 · 72 MW · 12 21 Feb 2017 · 44 MW · 9 22 Feb 2017 · 56 MW · 10 23 Feb 2017 · 16 MW · 2 26 Feb 2017 · 22 MW · 4
4 Feb 8 Feb 14 Feb 17 Feb 22 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

41°high
42km/h · peak gust
3%lowest humidity

It had gone 11 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

4% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 270 ha in 2016.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 4.3% of the area of London (68 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Anambra West where it started
    6,599 ha reached on 4 Feb
    11 %
  2. 213 ha reached on 7 Feb
    0.2 %
  3. 0 ha reached on 11 Feb
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area1.8 ha
Residents≈ 1,100

Inside the perimeter there were about 1.8 hectares of built-up land and about 1,100 residents (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
4 Feb 38.7 °C 22 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
5 Feb 38.2 °C 25 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
6 Feb 37.8 °C 24 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
7 Feb 38.5 °C 22 % 35 km/h 0.1 mm Very high 46
8 Feb 37.7 °C 23 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
9 Feb 38.2 °C 23 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
10 Feb 38.8 °C 25 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
11 Feb 40.2 °C 18 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
12 Feb 38.2 °C 27 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
13 Feb 38.8 °C 16 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
14 Feb 40.7 °C 3 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 57
15 Feb 39.0 °C 13 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
16 Feb 38.2 °C 8 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
17 Feb 38.3 °C 4 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
18 Feb 37.1 °C 8 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
19 Feb 38.3 °C 5 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
20 Feb 38.1 °C 11 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
21 Feb 39.4 °C 18 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
22 Feb 39.3 °C 18 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
23 Feb 38.7 °C 23 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
24 Feb 40.6 °C 21 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 57
25 Feb 39.6 °C 23 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
26 Feb 37.5 °C 31 % 38 km/h 0.1 mm Very high 48
27 Feb after 38.7 °C 30 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
28 Feb after 38.6 °C 30 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
1 Mar after 39.2 °C 28 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
2 Mar after 37.4 °C 30 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
3 Mar after 39.3 °C 34 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
4 Mar after 38.7 °C 26 % 42 km/h 0.1 mm Very high 49
5 Mar after 40.0 °C 29 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
6 Mar after 36.6 °C 43 % 43 km/h 0.6 mm High 36
7 Mar after 39.7 °C 26 % 39 km/h 0.2 mm Very high 45
8 Mar after 40.0 °C 24 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 43.2, a minimum humidity of 22% and 11 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 31.

FWI at the start 43.2
Minimum humidity 22 %
Days without rain 11
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Agatu fire, February 2023
2,138 ha 21 days FWI 41.9 Min. humidity 22 % 181 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

16 days
median duration
3,009 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.8 mm
rain at the end (median; 10 of 31 had it)

It was 2.2 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 23 days, against 16 days.

Only 2 of its 31 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 21 of 31, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.8 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
42km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 26 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 10 of 31, with a median of 1.8 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 28 Jan 2017
After · 5 Mar 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 357Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Nigeria

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Anambra West fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 4 February 2017 to 26 February 2017 (23 days). The perimeter dates it from 11 February 2017 to 19 February 2017.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 6,767 hectares (67.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 3 municipalities: Anambra West (6,599 ha, 11 %); Ibaji (213 ha, 0.2 %); Anambra East (0 ha, 0.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 40.7 °C, humidity dropped to 3 % and gusts hit 42 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 58, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Nigeria (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 31. Their median duration was 16 days and their median area 3,009 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 2 of its 31 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 21 of 31, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.8 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 19 February 2017 → 26 February 2017.
  2. Start date: 11 February 2017 → 4 February 2017.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 11 February 2017 to 19 February 2017. 357 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.