Skip to content
worldfires
TN · Tunisia ·

الوسلاتية fire, June 2025 الوسلاتية

Out · last detection 20 Jun 2025, 13:03 UTC

The fire started on 20 June 2025 in الوسلاتية, Tunisia, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 167 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality.

Number 9 in Tunisia in 2025, of 12.

The power measured by the satellite is low (6.1 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
167ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
1day
20 Jun 2025 – 20 Jun 2025
Municipalities hit
1
delegations
Started on
20 Jun
2025
Heat detections
6
in a single hotspot: 6 MW
Danger at start
37
High · FWI index
Average daily power
32MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 20 Jun20 Jun

How it evolved, day by day

20 Jun 2025 · 32 MW · 6

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

31°high
49km/h · peak gust
35%lowest humidity

It had gone 26 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. الوسلاتية where it started
    168 ha reached on 20 Jun
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Sclerophyllous scrub95 %
  • Coniferous forest3.6 %
  • Other natural land1.8 %

Land cover inside the perimeter as reported by Copernicus EFFIS (outside the Corine Land Cover area).

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
20 Jun 30.6 °C 35 % 49 km/h 0.1 mm High 37
21 Jun after 33.0 °C 26 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
22 Jun after 34.1 °C 23 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
23 Jun after 34.9 °C 23 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
24 Jun after 35.2 °C 22 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
25 Jun after 37.5 °C 19 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
26 Jun after 36.9 °C 24 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
27 Jun after 36.8 °C 25 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
28 Jun after 34.2 °C 28 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
29 Jun after 33.7 °C 31 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
30 Jun after 33.6 °C 30 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 36.7, a minimum humidity of 35% and 26 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 17.

FWI at the start 36.7
Minimum humidity 35 %
Days without rain 26
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

نبر fire, July 2016
530 ha 10 days FWI 35.3 Min. humidity 33 % 103 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

4 days
median duration
395 ha
median area
6 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.2 mm
rain at the end (median; 8 of 17 had it)

It stayed below its twins: 167 ha against a median of 395 ha. It lasted 1 day, against 4 days.

In 9 of 17, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.2 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
49km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 20 Jun, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 8 of 17, with a median of 1.2 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 13 Jun 2025
After · 27 Jun 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 22 June 2025 the air beside the fire reached 12 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak12 µg/m³
Days over the guideline0 days
PM1018 µg/m³
Optical depth0.41
18 Jun20 Jun22 Jun
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 6Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Tunisia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the الوسلاتية fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 20 June 2025 and 20 June 2025: 1 day between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 167 hectares (1.7 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered الوسلاتية (168 ha, 0.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 30.6 °C, humidity dropped to 35 % and gusts hit 49 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 37, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Tunisia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 17. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 395 ha; 6 % went past 1,000 ha. In 9 of 17, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.2 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 198 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 198.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 6 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.