Burned area
satellite only2,964ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 3 Dec 2022 – 10 Dec 2022
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
SD · Sudan · –
Al Radoum fire, 3 December 2022 Al Radoum
Out · last detection 10 Dec 2022, 11:20 UTC
The fire started on 3 December 2022 in Al Radoum, Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 8 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,964 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 80th largest in South Darfur since 2016 (of 217 with a page). Number 19 in Sudan in 2022, of 65.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-27matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only8days
3 Dec 2022 to 10 Dec 2022: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 10 Dec 2022, 11:20 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only3 Dec 2022
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 3 Dec 2022
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only94
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 133 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 3 Dec 2022 – 10 Dec 2022
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only608MW
Total radiative power on 9 December 2022; hotspots that day: 41.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 9 Dec 2022
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model50.9FWI · extreme
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 41.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 3 Dec 2022, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model33.7°C · 17% RH
High of 33.7 °C and minimum humidity of 17% on 4 December 2022; gusts of 41 km/h on 3 December 2022.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 3 Dec 2022 – 10 Dec 2022
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
logStart date: 7 December 2022 → 3 December 2022.
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 27 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 2,964 ha
- Dates
- 3 Dec 2022 – 10 Dec 2022
- Name
- Al Radoum
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/al-radoum-2022-12-2?v=2026-10-27A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire al-radoum-2022-12-2.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-03 | 6 | 35 | 32.9 | 19.9 | 12 | 18.6 | 41.4 | 0 | 50.9 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-12-04 | 10 | 60 | 33.7 | 19.6 | 17 | 17.6 | 39.2 | 0 | 50.2 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-12-05 | 0 | 0 | 33.1 | 20.5 | 18 | 18.3 | 40.3 | 0 | 51.5 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-12-06 | 2 | 3 | 31.9 | 20.1 | 16 | 17.8 | 39.2 | 0 | 51.3 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-12-07 | 22 | 556 | 31.2 | 18.2 | 16 | 17.2 | 37.4 | 0 | 51 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-12-08 | 12 | 71 | 32.1 | 18.6 | 15 | 16.3 | 37.4 | 0 | 50.4 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-12-09 | 41 | 608 | 32.2 | 19.2 | 16 | 17.6 | 40 | 0 | 52.3 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-12-10 | 1 | 5 | 31.7 | 18.8 | 15 | 18.6 | 41 | 0 | 53.9 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-12-11 | 0 | 0 | 31.7 | 17.1 | 11 | 16 | 37.1 | 0 | 51.2 | extremo | 0 |
| 2022-12-12 | 0 | 0 | 32.8 | 17.5 | 12 | 14.8 | 35.3 | 0 | 50.2 | extremo | 0 |
| 2022-12-13 | 0 | 0 | 32.9 | 19.2 | 13 | 15.9 | 37.1 | 0 | 51.8 | extremo | 0 |
| 2022-12-14 | 0 | 0 | 32.6 | 19.5 | 13 | 10.5 | 28.4 | 0 | 46 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2022-12-15 | 0 | 0 | 32.3 | 19.2 | 12 | 17.1 | 38.9 | 0 | 53.9 | extremo | 0 |
| 2022-12-16 | 0 | 0 | 32.7 | 18.5 | 13 | 17 | 38.9 | 0 | 54.1 | extremo | 0 |
| 2022-12-17 | 0 | 0 | 32.8 | 18.8 | 16 | 17.5 | 40 | 0 | 54.4 | extremo | 0 |
| 2022-12-18 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | 19 | 15 | 14 | 33.5 | 0 | 50.6 | extremo | 0 |
| 2022-12-19 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | 18.5 | 15 | 12.9 | 32 | 0 | 49.6 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2022-12-20 | 0 | 0 | 33.5 | 19.1 | 15 | 13 | 32 | 0 | 50 | muy_alto | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 2,964ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 8days
- 3 Dec 2022 – 10 Dec 2022
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- localities
- Started on
- 3 Dec
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 94
- in a single hotspot: 133 MW
- Danger at start
- 51
- Extreme · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 191MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
3 Dec10 Dec
10 Dec 2022
How it evolved, day by day
3 Dec
6 Dec
9 Dec
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
34°high
41km/h · peak gust
12%lowest humidity
It had gone 41 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
79% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 818 ha in 2016, 467 ha in 2017, 1,091 ha in 2018, 924 ha in 2019, 63 ha in 2020, 1,317 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 2,328 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Al Radoum where it started1,605 ha reached on 3 Dec0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Started with Very dry air: 55 % of the area in Sudan
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Dec | 32.9 °C | 12 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 4 Dec | 33.7 °C | 17 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 5 Dec | 33.1 °C | 18 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 6 Dec | 31.9 °C | 16 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 7 Dec | 31.2 °C | 16 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 8 Dec | 32.1 °C | 15 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 9 Dec | 32.2 °C | 16 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 10 Dec | 31.7 °C | 15 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 11 Dec after | 31.7 °C | 11 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 12 Dec after | 32.8 °C | 12 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 13 Dec after | 32.9 °C | 13 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 14 Dec after | 32.6 °C | 13 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 15 Dec after | 32.3 °C | 12 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 16 Dec after | 32.7 °C | 13 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 17 Dec after | 32.8 °C | 16 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 18 Dec after | 33.3 °C | 15 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 19 Dec after | 33.3 °C | 15 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 20 Dec after | 33.5 °C | 15 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 50.9, a minimum humidity of 12% and 41 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 61.
FWI at the start
50.9
Minimum humidity
12 %
Days without rain
41
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Al Radoum fire, 3 December 2022
2,964 ha
8 days
FWI 50.9
Min. humidity 12 %
Ouadda fire, January 2018
7,001 ha
13 days
FWI 50.6
Min. humidity 12 %
138 km away, in 2018
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Yalinga fire, December 2021
13,892 ha
13 days
FWI 50.0
Min. humidity 14 %
17 km away, in 2021
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Al Radoum fire, December 2023
4,382 ha
7 days
FWI 49.7
Min. humidity 13 %
16 km away, in 2023
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Ouandja fire, December 2016
11,132 ha
17 days
FWI 48.5
Min. humidity 12 %
56 km away, in 2016
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Yalinga fire, December 2020
5,212 ha
6 days
FWI 49.8
Min. humidity 13 %
126 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
- 13 days
- median duration
- 6,735 ha
- median area
- 26 %
- went past 10,000 ha
- —
- rain at the end (median; 0 of 61 had it)
It stayed below its twins: 2,964 ha against a median of 6,735 ha. It lasted 8 days, against 13 days.
In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
—first rain
—no rain in ten days
41km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 10 Dec, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. None of its 61 twins had rain when they ended.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 26 Nov 2022
After · 17 Dec 2022
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 10 December 2022 the air beside the fire reached 57 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 34: 2.2 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
PM2.5 peak57 µg/m³
Days over the guideline8 days
PM1084 µg/m³
Optical depth1.18
WHO 15
5 Dec7 Dec9 Dec11 Dec13 Dec
Good
Fair
Moderate
Poor
Very poor
Extremely poor
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 94Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 20,838 haAl Radoum7 December 2016 · 13 days · 26 km away
- 106,778 haYalinga12 December 2025 · 42 days · 31 km away
- 17,315 haYalinga16 December 2021 · 18 days · 33 km away
- 24,698 haAl Radoum4 December 2021 · 20 days · 38 km away
- 48,565 haYalinga25 December 2025 · 34 days · 40 km away
- 16,467 haYalinga10 December 2021 · 22 days · 40 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Al Radoum fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 3 December 2022 to 10 December 2022 (8 days). The perimeter dates it from 7 December 2022 to 10 December 2022.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,964 hectares (29.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Al Radoum (1,605 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 33.7 °C, humidity dropped to 12 % and gusts hit 41 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 54, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 61. Their median duration was 13 days and their median area 6,735 ha; 26 % went past 10,000 ha. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
- Start date: 7 December 2022 → 3 December 2022.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 7 December 2022 to 10 December 2022. 94 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.