Skip to content
worldfires
TH · Thailand · –

Wiang Kaen fire, April 2016 เวียงแก่น · Wiang Kaen

Out · last detection 26 Apr 2016, 07:15 UTC

The fire started on 4 April 2016 in Wiang Kaen, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 23 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 4,224 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 19th largest in Chiang Rai Province since 2016 (of 163 with a page). Number 35 in Thailand in 2016, of 387.

Burnt area
4,224ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
23days
4 Apr 2016 – 26 Apr 2016
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
4 Apr
2016
Heat detections
176
in a single hotspot: 102 MW
Danger at start
27
High · FWI index
Average daily power
75MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 4 Apr26 Apr
26 Apr 2016

How it evolved, day by day

4 Apr 2016 · 29 MW · 2 7 Apr 2016 · 6 MW · 3 8 Apr 2016 · 10 MW · 2 10 Apr 2016 · 12 MW · 5 11 Apr 2016 · 28 MW · 6 12 Apr 2016 · 252 MW · 42 13 Apr 2016 · 85 MW · 13 14 Apr 2016 · 54 MW · 9 15 Apr 2016 · 37 MW · 8 16 Apr 2016 · 55 MW · 11 17 Apr 2016 · 333 MW · 39 18 Apr 2016 · 86 MW · 9 19 Apr 2016 · 262 MW · 5 21 Apr 2016 · 16 MW · 5 22 Apr 2016 · 45 MW · 7 23 Apr 2016 · 27 MW · 8 24 Apr 2016 · 7 MW · 1 26 Apr 2016 · 4 MW · 1
4 Apr 11 Apr 17 Apr 24 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

37°high
46km/h · peak gust
29%lowest humidity

It had gone 7 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.5 mm on 29 Apr.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.7% of the area of London (42 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Wiang Kaen เวียงแก่น where it started
    4,272 ha reached on 4 Apr
    8.7 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area7.5 ha
Residents≈ 1,200

Inside the perimeter there were about 7.5 hectares of built-up land and about 1,200 residents (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
4 Apr 34.5 °C 35 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
5 Apr 35.1 °C 34 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
6 Apr 34.2 °C 35 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
7 Apr 35.2 °C 30 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
8 Apr 34.7 °C 36 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
9 Apr 35.8 °C 38 % 36 km/h 3.0 mm Moderate 14
10 Apr 35.8 °C 35 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
11 Apr 36.8 °C 33 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
12 Apr 36.5 °C 32 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
13 Apr 35.7 °C 35 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
14 Apr 36.5 °C 34 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
15 Apr 36.7 °C 29 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
16 Apr 36.2 °C 32 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
17 Apr 35.9 °C 31 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
18 Apr 35.7 °C 41 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
19 Apr 35.5 °C 43 % 37 km/h 0.7 mm High 23
20 Apr 36.3 °C 33 % 39 km/h 3.1 mm Moderate 15
21 Apr 36.5 °C 33 % 39 km/h 0.1 mm High 29
22 Apr 35.2 °C 31 % 46 km/h 2.1 mm High 22
23 Apr 35.0 °C 41 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
24 Apr 35.0 °C 42 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
25 Apr 34.1 °C 43 % 33 km/h 0.2 mm High 23
26 Apr 35.7 °C 41 % 26 km/h 0.2 mm High 23
27 Apr after 37.4 °C 32 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
28 Apr after 37.7 °C 33 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
29 Apr after 34.7 °C 44 % 36 km/h 1.5 mm Moderate 16

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 27.4, a minimum humidity of 35% and 7 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 19.

FWI at the start 27.4
Minimum humidity 35 %
Days without rain 7
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Wiang Kaen fire, April 2019
2,174 ha 13 days FWI 29.1 Min. humidity 35 % 10 km away, in 2019

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

11 days
median duration
2,886 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
5.4 mm
rain at the end (median; 12 of 19 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (4,224 ha against a median of 2,886 ha) and lasted 23 days, against 11 days.

In 7 of 19, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.4 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

1.5 mmfirst rain
29 Apr3 days after it ended
46km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 26 Apr, and on 29 Apr 1.5 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 12 of 19, with a median of 5.4 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 28 Mar 2016
After · 3 May 2016

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 176Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Thailand

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Wiang Kaen fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 4 April 2016 to 26 April 2016 (23 days). The perimeter dates it from 10 April 2016 to 19 April 2016.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 4,224 hectares (42.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Wiang Kaen (4,272 ha, 8.7 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 36.8 °C, humidity dropped to 29 % and gusts hit 46 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 32, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 19. Their median duration was 11 days and their median area 2,886 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 7 of 19, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.4 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 199 · 191 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 19 April 2016 → 26 April 2016.
  2. Start date: 10 April 2016 → 4 April 2016.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 199 · 191.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 10 April 2016 to 19 April 2016. 176 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.