Skip to content
worldfires
TH · Thailand · –

Mae Phrik fire, 1 March 2024 แม่พริก · Sam Ngao, Mae Phrik, Li

Out · last detection 19 Mar 2024, 05:59 UTC

The fire started on 1 March 2024 in Mae Phrik, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 19 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 12,196 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.

It is the 3th largest in Lampang Province since 2016 (of 135 with a page). Number 3 in Thailand in 2024, of 277.

The power measured by the satellite is low (19.6 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
12,196ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
19days
1 Mar 2024 – 19 Mar 2024
Municipalities hit
3
districts
Started on
1 Mar
2024
Heat detections
502
in a single hotspot: 20 MW
Danger at start
32
High · FWI index
Average daily power
89MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 1 Mar19 Mar
19 Mar 2024

How it evolved, day by day

1 Mar 2024 · 74 MW · 32 2 Mar 2024 · 59 MW · 19 3 Mar 2024 · 19 MW · 8 4 Mar 2024 · 93 MW · 14 5 Mar 2024 · 101 MW · 27 6 Mar 2024 · 107 MW · 35 7 Mar 2024 · 108 MW · 38 8 Mar 2024 · 38 MW · 7 9 Mar 2024 · 51 MW · 20 10 Mar 2024 · 161 MW · 42 11 Mar 2024 · 246 MW · 68 12 Mar 2024 · 88 MW · 42 13 Mar 2024 · 131 MW · 46 14 Mar 2024 · 25 MW · 14 15 Mar 2024 · 75 MW · 26 16 Mar 2024 · 167 MW · 35 17 Mar 2024 · 124 MW · 26 18 Mar 2024 · 11 MW · 2 19 Mar 2024 · 4 MW · 1
1 Mar 5 Mar 11 Mar 17 Mar

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

37°high
43km/h · peak gust
21%lowest humidity

It had gone 30 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 53.8 mm on 20 Mar.

This area had burned before

93% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 3,492 ha in 2016, 4,453 ha in 2017, 2,630 ha in 2018, 9,660 ha in 2019, 1,136 ha in 2020, 4,040 ha in 2021, 2,915 ha in 2022, 5,922 ha in 2023. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 11,334 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 7.7% of the area of London (122 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Sam Ngao สามเงา
    8,222 ha reached on 3 Mar
    3.0 %
  2. Mae Phrik แม่พริก where it started
    3,162 ha reached on 1 Mar
    4.7 %
  3. Li ลี้
    877 ha reached on 13 Mar
    0.5 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area0.10 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.10 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
1 Mar 37.0 °C 22 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
2 Mar 35.8 °C 32 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
3 Mar 36.3 °C 27 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
4 Mar 36.3 °C 26 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
5 Mar 37.3 °C 22 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
6 Mar 37.1 °C 26 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
7 Mar 36.1 °C 30 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
8 Mar 37.3 °C 28 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
9 Mar 37.0 °C 22 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
10 Mar 36.8 °C 21 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
11 Mar 37.0 °C 24 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
12 Mar 36.9 °C 24 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
13 Mar 35.6 °C 23 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
14 Mar 35.8 °C 25 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
15 Mar 35.7 °C 28 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
16 Mar 37.0 °C 27 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
17 Mar 36.3 °C 31 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
18 Mar 36.9 °C 32 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
19 Mar 36.0 °C 36 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
20 Mar after 27.3 °C 75 % 31 km/h 53.8 mm Very low 0

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 32.0, a minimum humidity of 22% and 30 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 50.

FWI at the start 32.0
Minimum humidity 22 %
Days without rain 30
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Chom Thong fire, March 2019
1,338 ha 13 days FWI 31.9 Min. humidity 22 % 121 km away, in 2019

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

9 days
median duration
1,379 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.2 mm
rain at the end (median; 22 of 50 had it)

It was 8.8 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 19 days, against 9 days.

Only 2 of its 50 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 28 of 50, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.2 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

53.8 mmfirst rain
20 Marthe day after it ended
43km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 19 Mar, and on 20 Mar 53.8 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 22 of 50, with a median of 2.2 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 23 Feb 2024
After · 26 Mar 2024

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 17 March 2024 the air beside the fire reached 66 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 50: 3.3 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak66 µg/m³
Days over the guideline21 days
PM10100 µg/m³
Optical depth2.11
28 Feb4 Mar9 Mar14 Mar19 Mar
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 502Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Thailand

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Mae Phrik fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 1 March 2024 and 19 March 2024: 19 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 12,196 hectares (122.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 3 municipalities: Sam Ngao (8,222 ha, 3.0 %); Mae Phrik (3,162 ha, 4.7 %); Li (877 ha, 0.5 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 37.3 °C, humidity dropped to 21 % and gusts hit 43 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 48, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 50. Their median duration was 9 days and their median area 1,379 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 2 of its 50 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 28 of 50, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.2 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 199 · 191 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 199 · 191.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 502 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.