Ouô fire, 7 January 2026 Ouô, Mangodara
The fire started on 7 January 2026 in Ouô, Burkina Faso, and satellites saw it burning for 27 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 29,152 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 2th largest in Tannounyan since 2016 (of 140 with a page). Number 2 in Burkina Faso in 2026, of 221.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Ouô · 2025Ouô · 2025Ouô · 2024Mangodara · 2025
- Burnt area
- 29,152ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 27days
- 7 Jan 2026 – 2 Feb 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- communes
- Started on
- 7 Jan
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 721
- in a single hotspot: 0 MW
- Danger at start
- 32
- High · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 224MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 22 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
28% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 92 ha in 2022, 16 ha in 2023, 1,478 ha in 2024, 6,747 ha in 2025.
- 2,250 ha Ouô fire, January 2025 4,258 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,944 ha Ouô fire, January 2025 1,962 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,478 ha Ouô fire, February 2024 1,293 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 914 ha Mangodara fire, January 2025 3,535 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 535 ha Ouô fire, January 2025 1,116 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 488 ha Ouô fire, February 2025 1,041 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 312 ha Ouô fire, December 2025 1,344 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 248 ha Ouô fire, February 2025 1,642 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Ouô where it started27,490 ha11 %
-
1,816 ha0.7 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Inside the perimeter there were about 45 hectares of built-up land and about 5,400 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Jan | 34.7 °C | 29 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 8 Jan | 31.6 °C | 22 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 9 Jan | 35.5 °C | 17 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 10 Jan | 34.6 °C | 16 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 11 Jan | 34.9 °C | 17 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 12 Jan | 34.1 °C | 18 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 13 Jan | 34.6 °C | 18 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 14 Jan | 34.6 °C | 22 % | 15 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 15 Jan | 34.9 °C | 22 % | 19 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 16 Jan | 35.0 °C | 17 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 17 Jan | 33.9 °C | 17 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 18 Jan | 35.3 °C | 15 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 19 Jan | 34.6 °C | 19 % | 18 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 20 Jan | 33.3 °C | 18 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 21 Jan | 32.3 °C | 23 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 22 Jan | 32.3 °C | 17 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 23 Jan | 32.5 °C | 14 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 24 Jan | 34.5 °C | 14 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 25 Jan | 33.9 °C | 9 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 26 Jan | 34.1 °C | 12 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 27 Jan | 34.9 °C | 11 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 28 Jan | 35.4 °C | 12 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 29 Jan | 35.1 °C | 10 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 30 Jan | 36.6 °C | 11 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 31 Jan | 36.5 °C | 14 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 1 Feb | 36.0 °C | 22 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 2 Feb | 36.6 °C | 23 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 3 Feb after | 30.9 °C | 41 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 4 Feb after | 35.7 °C | 23 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 5 Feb after | 37.4 °C | 14 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 6 Feb after | 36.9 °C | 15 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 7 Feb after | 36.5 °C | 18 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 8 Feb after | 36.8 °C | 15 % | 19 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 9 Feb after | 36.8 °C | 14 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 10 Feb after | 35.1 °C | 18 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 11 Feb after | 35.6 °C | 26 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 12 Feb after | 37.9 °C | 16 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 13 January 2026 the air beside the fire reached 83 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 59: 3.9 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 0Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Ouô fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 7 January 2026 and 2 February 2026: 27 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 29,152 hectares (291.5 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Ouô (27,490 ha, 11 %); Mangodara (1,816 ha, 0.7 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.6 °C, humidity dropped to 9 % and gusts hit 42 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 56, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Burkina Faso (OCHA COD-AB). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 4 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from OCHA COD-AB (Institut Geographique Burkina (IGB)) (Creative Commons Attribution for Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY-IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.