Mae Mo fire, 1 March 2026 Mae Mo
The fire started on 1 March 2026 in Mae Mo, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,227 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 136th largest in Lampang Province since 2016 (of 202 with a page). Number 665 in Thailand in 2026, of 880.
The power measured by the satellite is low (10.1 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
- Burnt area
- 1,227ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 4days
- 1 Mar 2026 – 4 Mar 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- districts
- Started on
- 1 Mar
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 17
- in a single hotspot: 10 MW
- Danger at start
- 25
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 45MW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 3 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.3 mm on 11 Mar.
This area had burned before
56% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 265 ha in 2016, 413 ha in 2017, 6 ha in 2019, 107 ha in 2020, 124 ha in 2023, 256 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 682 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
Mae Mo where it started1,233 ha reached on 1 Mar1.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Mar | 33.8 °C | 30 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 2 Mar | 33.7 °C | 21 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 3 Mar | 33.9 °C | 25 % | 18 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 4 Mar | 34.4 °C | 26 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 5 Mar after | 33.0 °C | 35 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 6 Mar after | 32.3 °C | 44 % | 27 km/h | 0.6 mm | High 22 |
| 7 Mar after | 33.3 °C | 38 % | 19 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 21 |
| 8 Mar after | 33.6 °C | 39 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 9 Mar after | 34.7 °C | 34 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 10 Mar after | 31.8 °C | 39 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 11 Mar after | 30.9 °C | 42 % | 19 km/h | 1.3 mm | Moderate 13 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 4 March 2026 the air beside the fire reached 104 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 48: 3.2 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 17Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Mae Mo fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 1 March 2026 and 4 March 2026: 4 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,227 hectares (12.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Mae Mo (1,233 ha, 1.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 34.4 °C, humidity dropped to 21 % and gusts hit 29 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 30, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 199 · 191
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.