Skip to content
worldfires
CG · Republic of the Congo · –

Ngabé fire, 25 August 2021 Ngabé

Out · last detection 31 Aug 2021, 11:54 UTC

The fire started on 25 August 2021 in Ngabé, Republic of the Congo, and satellites saw it burning for 7 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,056 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 176th largest in Pool since 2016 (of 202 with a page). Number 44 in Republic of the Congo in 2021, of 50.

Burnt area
1,056ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
7days
25 Aug 2021 – 31 Aug 2021
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
25 Aug
2021
Heat detections
16
in a single hotspot: 113 MW
Danger at start
19
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
52MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 25 Aug31 Aug
31 Aug 2021

How it evolved, day by day

25 Aug 2021 · 153 MW · 5 26 Aug 2021 · 22 MW · 6 27 Aug 2021 · 30 MW · 4 31 Aug 2021 · 3 MW · 1
25 Aug 26 Aug 27 Aug 31 Aug

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

35°high
41km/h · peak gust
38%lowest humidity

It had gone 0 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.3 mm on 3 Sept.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.7% of the area of London (11 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Ngabé where it started
    1,062 ha reached on 25 Aug
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
25 Aug 35.0 °C 38 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
26 Aug 32.4 °C 47 % 25 km/h 0.1 mm Moderate 18
27 Aug 31.5 °C 53 % 41 km/h 0.6 mm Moderate 20
28 Aug 31.5 °C 50 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
29 Aug 31.9 °C 50 % 30 km/h 3.1 mm High 22
30 Aug 33.7 °C 46 % 24 km/h 3.5 mm Low 8
31 Aug 30.3 °C 55 % 26 km/h 3.6 mm Very low 3
1 Sept after 33.0 °C 44 % 30 km/h 0.3 mm Low 9
2 Sept after 30.1 °C 52 % 36 km/h 0.2 mm Moderate 16
3 Sept after 28.5 °C 55 % 40 km/h 1.3 mm Low 9

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 18.9, a minimum humidity of 38% and rain the day before. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 40.

FWI at the start 18.9
Minimum humidity 38 %
Days without rain 0
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Djambala fire, August 2018
1,121 ha 2 days FWI 24.1 Min. humidity 41 % 30 km away, in 2018

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.4 mm on 24 Aug.

What happened to them

4 days
median duration
1,293 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.6 mm
rain at the end (median; 29 of 40 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (1,056 ha against a median of 1,293 ha) and lasted 7 days, against 4 days.

In 11 of 40, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.6 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

1.3 mmfirst rain
3 Sept3 days after it ended
41km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 31 Aug, and on 3 Sept 1.3 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 29 of 40, with a median of 1.6 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 18 Aug 2021
After · 7 Sept 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 16Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Republic of the Congo

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Ngabé fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 25 August 2021 to 31 August 2021 (7 days). The perimeter dates it from 25 August 2021 to 27 August 2021.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,056 hectares (10.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Ngabé (1,062 ha, 0.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 35.0 °C, humidity dropped to 38 % and gusts hit 41 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 22, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Republic of the Congo (geoBoundaries ADM2). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 40. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 1,293 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 11 of 40, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.6 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Name: Madingo-Kayes → Ngabé.
  2. Last day with fire: 27 August 2021 → 31 August 2021.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 25 August 2021 to 27 August 2021. 16 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Map Library 2007, nombres de Wikidata) (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.