Lupososhi fire, 25 July 2026 Lupososhi, Kawambwa, Chipili
The fire started on 25 July 2026 in Lupososhi, Zambia, and satellites saw it burning for 65 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 156,557 hectares from heat detections, spread across 4 municipalities.
This page is probably a fire complex, not a single fire. GWIS merges into one perimeter the fires that touch over weeks, which in large burning seasons can join dozens of separate fires. The total area is reliable; the origin and dates refer to the whole complex.
It is the 2th largest in Northern since 2016 (of 628 with a page). Number 7 in Zambia in 2026, of 604.
- Burnt area
- 156,557ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 65days
- 25 Jul 2026 – 27 Sept 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 4
- districts
- Started on
- 25 Jul
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 7,197
- in a single hotspot: 282 MW
- Danger at start
- 32
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 83.4GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.1 mm on 5 Oct.
This area had burned before
99% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 91,204 ha in 2016, 79,077 ha in 2017, 69,660 ha in 2018, 84,059 ha in 2019, 59,055 ha in 2020, 83,689 ha in 2021, 69,938 ha in 2022, 60,173 ha in 2023, 68,820 ha in 2024, 81,306 ha in 2025. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 154,848 ha that had burned before.
- 69,998 ha Kawambwa fire, August 2016 123,335 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 27,794 ha Chipili fire, July 2024 36,195 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 26,207 ha Lupososhi fire, August 2021 34,216 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 24,307 ha Kawambwa fire, August 2019 97,462 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 23,615 ha Kawambwa fire, August 2017 98,647 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 23,471 ha Lupososhi fire, August 2019 35,869 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 23,418 ha Chipili fire, August 2023 27,236 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 21,195 ha Chipili fire, August 2025 110,204 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
What happened to each town
-
Lupososhi where it started73,876 ha reached on 25 Jul18 %
-
58,773 ha reached on 30 Jul7.3 %
-
24,826 ha reached on 25 Jul5.8 %
-
58 ha reached on 11 Aug0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Jul | 25.8 °C | 33 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 26 Jul | 25.2 °C | 37 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 27 Jul | 24.6 °C | 41 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 28 Jul | 26.1 °C | 35 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 29 Jul | 26.8 °C | 34 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 30 Jul | 26.1 °C | 36 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 31 Jul | 25.6 °C | 29 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 1 Aug | 23.8 °C | 27 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 2 Aug | 24.0 °C | 34 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 3 Aug | 23.9 °C | 39 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 4 Aug | 24.5 °C | 38 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 5 Aug | 25.2 °C | 39 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 6 Aug | 25.8 °C | 40 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 7 Aug | 26.7 °C | 40 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 8 Aug | 26.9 °C | 42 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 9 Aug | 27.4 °C | 39 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 10 Aug | 29.9 °C | 28 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 11 Aug | 29.7 °C | 28 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 12 Aug | 28.4 °C | 27 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 13 Aug | 25.7 °C | 43 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 14 Aug | 23.4 °C | 45 % | 53 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 15 Aug | 24.4 °C | 36 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 16 Aug | 24.8 °C | 34 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 17 Aug | 25.6 °C | 29 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 18 Aug | 26.3 °C | 26 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 19 Aug | 26.0 °C | 26 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 20 Aug | 26.1 °C | 31 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 21 Aug | 26.3 °C | 32 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 22 Aug | 27.9 °C | 28 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 23 Aug | 27.6 °C | 33 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 24 Aug | 28.3 °C | 35 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 25 Aug | 27.7 °C | 40 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 26 Aug | 28.6 °C | 38 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 27 Aug | 28.4 °C | 38 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 28 Aug | 27.1 °C | 39 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 29 Aug | 28.0 °C | 35 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 30 Aug | 29.3 °C | 28 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 31 Aug | 29.4 °C | 29 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 1 Sept | 29.0 °C | 33 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 2 Sept | 29.3 °C | 33 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 3 Sept | 30.5 °C | 28 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 4 Sept | 31.4 °C | 30 % | 25 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 31 |
| 5 Sept | 29.6 °C | 33 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 6 Sept | 29.7 °C | 36 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 7 Sept | 29.9 °C | 33 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 8 Sept | 27.5 °C | 34 % | 56 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 9 Sept | 27.4 °C | 38 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 10 Sept | 28.0 °C | 34 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 11 Sept | 29.1 °C | 33 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 12 Sept | 30.0 °C | 31 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 13 Sept | 30.5 °C | 29 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 14 Sept | 30.7 °C | 29 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 15 Sept | 30.9 °C | 28 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 16 Sept | 30.9 °C | 24 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 17 Sept | 29.8 °C | 26 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 18 Sept | 30.3 °C | 25 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 19 Sept | 30.5 °C | 29 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 20 Sept | 31.6 °C | 27 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 21 Sept | 30.0 °C | 32 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 22 Sept | 30.7 °C | 33 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 23 Sept | 30.7 °C | 36 % | 38 km/h | 0.4 mm | High 36 |
| 24 Sept | 30.3 °C | 32 % | 36 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 37 |
| 25 Sept | 30.1 °C | 32 % | 47 km/h | 0.1 mm | Very high 40 |
| 26 Sept | 31.2 °C | 31 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 27 Sept | 32.0 °C | 29 % | 29 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 34 |
| 28 Sept after | 32.4 °C | 32 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 29 Sept after | 31.5 °C | 33 % | 33 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 35 |
| 30 Sept after | 30.7 °C | 29 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 1 Oct after | 29.4 °C | 35 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 2 Oct after | 27.6 °C | 47 % | 34 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 30 |
| 3 Oct after | 27.6 °C | 50 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 4 Oct after | 30.0 °C | 39 % | 40 km/h | 0.5 mm | High 30 |
| 5 Oct after | 28.4 °C | 45 % | 39 km/h | 1.1 mm | Moderate 18 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 5 September 2026 the air beside the fire reached 236 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 127: 8.5 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 7,197Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 36,195 haChipili26 July 2024 · 21 days · 3 km away
- 110,204 haChipili9 August 2025 · 32 days · 5 km away
- 34,216 haLupososhi26 August 2021 · 14 days · 18 km away
- 35,869 haLupososhiAugust 2019 · 17 days · 21 km away
- 81,932 haChipili9 August 2019 · 33 days · 22 km away
- 296,161 haMansa15 August 2025 · 37 days · 31 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Lupososhi fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 25 July 2026 to 27 September 2026 (65 days). The perimeter dates it from 1 August 2026 to 21 September 2026.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 156,557 hectares (1,565.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 4 municipalities: Lupososhi (73,876 ha, 18 %); Kawambwa (58,773 ha, 7.3 %); Chipili (24,826 ha, 5.8 %); Luwingu (58 ha, 0.0 %).
- Is the Lupososhi fire still active?
- No fire detections since 28 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC. A lack of detections is not an official extinction.
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 32.0 °C, humidity dropped to 24 % and gusts hit 56 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 44, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zambia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.