Lubalo fire, 31 July 2017 Lubalo, Capenda-Camulemba
The fire started on 31 July 2017 in Lubalo, Angola, and satellites saw it burning for 26 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 15,642 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 33th largest in Lunda Norte since 2016 (of 411 with a page). Number 13 in Angola in 2017, of 158.
Compare with…
- Burnt area
- 15,642ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 26days
- 31 Jul 2017 – 25 Aug 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 31 Jul
- 2017
- Heat detections
- 896
- in a single hotspot: 213 MW
- Danger at start
- 42
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 561MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
41% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 6,756 ha in 2016. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 6,346 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Lubalo where it started12,121 ha reached on 1 Aug0.8 %
-
3,624 ha reached on 31 Jul0.4 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Jul | 31.0 °C | 20 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 1 Aug | 32.3 °C | 17 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 2 Aug | 29.8 °C | 24 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 3 Aug | 31.7 °C | 19 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 4 Aug | 32.0 °C | 18 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 5 Aug | 30.1 °C | 20 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 6 Aug | 30.6 °C | 19 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 7 Aug | 31.4 °C | 19 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 8 Aug | 31.1 °C | 23 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 9 Aug | 30.3 °C | 18 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 10 Aug | 29.7 °C | 18 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 11 Aug | 29.9 °C | 16 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 12 Aug | 31.0 °C | 19 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 13 Aug | 31.6 °C | 17 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 14 Aug | 31.5 °C | 16 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 15 Aug | 31.6 °C | 14 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 16 Aug | 32.7 °C | 14 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 17 Aug | 32.0 °C | 14 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 18 Aug | 30.3 °C | 24 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 19 Aug | 31.2 °C | 21 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 20 Aug | 31.8 °C | 23 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 21 Aug | 31.1 °C | 18 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 22 Aug | 31.4 °C | 15 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 23 Aug | 32.3 °C | 16 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 24 Aug | 32.8 °C | 22 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 25 Aug | 32.4 °C | 14 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 26 Aug after | 33.0 °C | 12 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 27 Aug after | 30.3 °C | 25 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 28 Aug after | 32.0 °C | 26 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 29 Aug after | 31.6 °C | 13 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 30 Aug after | 32.7 °C | 14 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 31 Aug after | 32.4 °C | 18 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 1 Sept after | 33.7 °C | 14 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 2 Sept after | 33.4 °C | 12 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 3 Sept after | 31.9 °C | 12 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 4 Sept after | 30.7 °C | 18 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 896Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Lubalo fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 31 July 2017 to 25 August 2017 (26 days). The perimeter dates it from 7 August 2017 to 18 August 2017.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 15,642 hectares (156.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Lubalo (12,121 ha, 0.8 %); Capenda-Camulemba (3,624 ha, 0.4 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 32.8 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 51 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 51, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Angola (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 7 August 2017 to 18 August 2017. 896 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.