Fang fire, 9 March 2019 Thailand
The fire started on 9 March 2019 in Fang, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,669 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 208th largest in Chiang Mai Province since 2016 (of 463 with a page). Number 208 in Thailand in 2019, of 503.
We have the GWIS perimeter for this fire, but the VIIRS sensors did not capture it in enough detail: no day-by-day evolution, but the split by municipality is there.
- Burnt area
- 1,669ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 4days
- 9 Mar 2019 – 12 Mar 2019
- Municipalities hit
- 0
- districts
- Started on
- 9 Mar
- 2019
- Danger at start
- 37
- High · FWI index
Where it burned
The weather it burned in
It had gone 48 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
90% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 841 ha in 2016, 1,396 ha in 2017, 895 ha in 2018. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,499 ha that had burned before.
- 895 ha Fang fire, March 2018 3,190 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 455 ha Fang fire, March 2016 1,044 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 372 ha Fang fire, March 2017 1,230 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 64 ha Fang fire, March 2017 1,264 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Mar | 34.2 °C | 17 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 10 Mar | 33.3 °C | 23 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 11 Mar | 33.5 °C | 21 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 12 Mar | 34.4 °C | 25 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 13 Mar after | 34.9 °C | 20 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 14 Mar after | 35.1 °C | 23 % | 18 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 15 Mar after | 35.8 °C | 26 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 16 Mar after | 35.8 °C | 27 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 17 Mar after | 37.6 °C | 19 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 18 Mar after | 37.5 °C | 21 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 19 Mar after | 36.5 °C | 20 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 20 Mar after | 36.5 °C | 21 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 21 Mar after | 36.4 °C | 20 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 22 Mar after | 35.0 °C | 23 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Fang fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 9 March 2019 and 12 March 2019: 4 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,669 hectares (16.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 34.4 °C, humidity dropped to 17 % and gusts hit 37 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 37, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 199 · 191
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.