Cosalá fire, May 2025 Tamazula, Cosalá
The fire started on 16 May 2025 in Cosalá, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 11 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,828 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 16th largest in Sinaloa since 2016 (of 84 with a page). Number 24 in Mexico in 2025, of 167.
The power measured by the satellite is low (25.0 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
- Burnt area
- 5,828ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 11days
- 16 May 2025 – 26 May 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 16 May
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 510
- in a single hotspot: 25 MW
- Danger at start
- 43
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 2.4GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 33 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 12.1 mm on 31 May.
This area had burned before
76% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,374 ha in 2017, 4,652 ha in 2023. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 4,440 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
5,611 ha reached on 14 May1.0 %
-
Cosalá where it started222 ha reached on 10 May0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 May | 35.5 °C | 19 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 10 May | 35.2 °C | 20 % | 41 km/h | 0.1 mm | Very high 42 |
| 11 May | 33.9 °C | 22 % | 42 km/h | 0.1 mm | Very high 43 |
| 12 May | 32.9 °C | 25 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 13 May | 34.2 °C | 17 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 14 May | 33.8 °C | 16 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 15 May | 35.7 °C | 16 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 16 May | 36.3 °C | 17 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 17 May | 35.6 °C | 19 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 18 May | 35.1 °C | 15 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 19 May | 34.5 °C | 15 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 20 May | 36.5 °C | 11 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 21 May | 37.9 °C | 11 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 22 May | 36.7 °C | 13 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 23 May | 36.5 °C | 16 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 24 May | 36.7 °C | 19 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 25 May | 35.1 °C | 26 % | 45 km/h | 1.5 mm | High 30 |
| 26 May | 34.6 °C | 26 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 27 May after | 35.1 °C | 24 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 28 May after | 34.9 °C | 21 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 29 May after | 34.5 °C | 25 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 30 May after | 27.7 °C | 44 % | 27 km/h | 0.6 mm | High 26 |
| 31 May after | 30.9 °C | 39 % | 34 km/h | 12.1 mm | Very low 4 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 25 May 2025 the air beside the fire reached 176 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 61: 4.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 510Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 6,040 haTamazula22 May 2023 · 9 days · 1 km away
- 6,068 haTamazula17 May 2019 · 16 days · 23 km away
- 12,257 haTamazula3 June 2019 · 27 days · 25 km away
- 15,732 haTamazula19 May 2018 · 20 days · 28 km away
- 9,739 haTamazula11 May 2018 · 15 days · 35 km away
- 49,719 haSan IgnacioMarch 2025 · 65 days · 39 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Cosalá fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 16 May 2025 and 26 May 2025: 11 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,828 hectares (58.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Tamazula (5,611 ha, 1.0 %); Cosalá (222 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 37.9 °C, humidity dropped to 11 % and gusts hit 51 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 52, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.