Chipili fire, July 2026 Chipili, Mansa, Lupososhi
The fire started on 30 July 2026 in Chipili, Zambia, and satellites saw it burning for 59 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 614,688 hectares from heat detections, spread across 7 municipalities.
This page is probably a fire complex, not a single fire. GWIS merges into one perimeter the fires that touch over weeks, which in large burning seasons can join dozens of separate fires. The total area is reliable; the origin and dates refer to the whole complex.
It is the largest fire in Luapula since 2016 (of 533 with a page). The largest in Zambia in 2026, of 604.
- Burnt area
- 614,688ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 59days
- 30 Jul 2026 – 26 Sept 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 7
- districts
- Started on
- 30 Jul
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 18,406
- in a single hotspot: 294 MW
- Danger at start
- 33
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 179.0GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 3.2 mm on 28 Sept.
This area had burned before
98% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 330,416 ha in 2016, 353,038 ha in 2017, 239,933 ha in 2018, 335,166 ha in 2019, 305,605 ha in 2020, 341,331 ha in 2021, 294,785 ha in 2022, 263,728 ha in 2023, 322,114 ha in 2024, 379,495 ha in 2025. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 604,110 ha that had burned before.
- 218,062 ha Mansa fire, August 2025 296,161 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 205,978 ha Mansa fire, August 2021 259,734 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 192,932 ha Mansa fire, August 2020 280,384 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 191,660 ha Mansa fire, August 2017 258,414 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 144,091 ha Mansa fire, August 2019 190,302 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 138,378 ha Mansa fire, August 2022 185,598 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 110,464 ha Mansa fire, August 2023 133,309 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 83,666 ha Mansa fire, August 2024 104,574 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
What happened to each town
-
Chipili where it started229,118 ha reached on 30 Jul53 %
-
210,003 ha reached on 30 Jul27 %
-
84,802 ha reached on 30 Jul20 %
-
50,611 ha reached on 30 Jul6.3 %
-
24,652 ha reached on 30 Jul10 %
-
11,218 ha reached on 30 Jul3.6 %
-
8,133 ha reached on 30 Jul6.9 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Jul | 28.6 °C | 34 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 31 Jul | 28.7 °C | 25 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 1 Aug | 26.8 °C | 24 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 2 Aug | 26.8 °C | 30 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 3 Aug | 26.9 °C | 35 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 4 Aug | 27.6 °C | 35 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 5 Aug | 28.2 °C | 34 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 6 Aug | 28.7 °C | 38 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 7 Aug | 29.5 °C | 37 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 8 Aug | 30.0 °C | 37 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 9 Aug | 29.9 °C | 35 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 10 Aug | 31.8 °C | 28 % | 17 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 11 Aug | 31.7 °C | 29 % | 17 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 12 Aug | 31.9 °C | 20 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 13 Aug | 29.5 °C | 33 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 14 Aug | 26.9 °C | 42 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 15 Aug | 27.5 °C | 31 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 16 Aug | 27.7 °C | 30 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 17 Aug | 28.6 °C | 26 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 18 Aug | 29.2 °C | 23 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 19 Aug | 29.1 °C | 21 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 20 Aug | 29.1 °C | 25 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 21 Aug | 29.6 °C | 27 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 22 Aug | 30.6 °C | 24 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 23 Aug | 31.0 °C | 29 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 24 Aug | 31.2 °C | 32 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 25 Aug | 30.5 °C | 35 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 26 Aug | 31.8 °C | 33 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 27 Aug | 31.8 °C | 33 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 28 Aug | 30.2 °C | 34 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 29 Aug | 30.5 °C | 32 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 30 Aug | 31.4 °C | 28 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 31 Aug | 32.3 °C | 27 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 1 Sept | 31.9 °C | 29 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 2 Sept | 32.5 °C | 28 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 3 Sept | 32.7 °C | 28 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 4 Sept | 32.8 °C | 33 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 5 Sept | 31.1 °C | 38 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 6 Sept | 31.9 °C | 35 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 7 Sept | 33.1 °C | 28 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 8 Sept | 31.3 °C | 29 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 9 Sept | 30.4 °C | 32 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 10 Sept | 30.8 °C | 32 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 11 Sept | 32.5 °C | 28 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 12 Sept | 32.9 °C | 28 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 13 Sept | 33.3 °C | 27 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 14 Sept | 33.6 °C | 25 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 15 Sept | 33.8 °C | 25 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 16 Sept | 33.7 °C | 24 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 17 Sept | 32.7 °C | 22 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 18 Sept | 33.2 °C | 26 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 19 Sept | 33.2 °C | 25 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 20 Sept | 35.0 °C | 24 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 21 Sept | 32.0 °C | 31 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 22 Sept | 34.2 °C | 28 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 23 Sept | 33.9 °C | 32 % | 27 km/h | 0.2 mm | Very high 39 |
| 24 Sept | 33.4 °C | 27 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 25 Sept | 33.3 °C | 27 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 26 Sept | 34.0 °C | 29 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 27 Sept after | 33.9 °C | 30 % | 28 km/h | 0.6 mm | High 33 |
| 28 Sept after | 33.1 °C | 40 % | 28 km/h | 3.2 mm | Low 10 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 5 September 2026 the air beside the fire reached 153 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 101: 6.8 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 18,406Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Chipili fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 30 July 2026 to 26 September 2026 (59 days). The perimeter dates it from 31 July 2026 to 19 September 2026.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 614,688 hectares (6,146.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 7 municipalities: Chipili (229,118 ha, 53 %); Mansa (210,003 ha, 27 %); Lupososhi (84,802 ha, 20 %); Kawambwa (50,611 ha, 6.3 %); Mwense (24,652 ha, 10 %); Chifunabuli (11,218 ha, 3.6 %); Mwansabombwe (8,133 ha, 6.9 %).
- Is the Chipili fire still active?
- No fire detections since 26 Sept 2026, 11:38 UTC. A lack of detections is not an official extinction.
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 35.0 °C, humidity dropped to 20 % and gusts hit 39 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 42, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zambia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.